Medical Inquiries and Observations, Vol. 4: The Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged by the AuthorRush, Benjamin
History
Medical Inquiries and Observations, Vol. 4: The Second Edition, Revised and Enlarged by the Author
Rush, Benjamin
Medicine; Yellow fever -- Pennsylvania -- Philadelphia
exertions to purify the ship; washing, scouring with vinegar, burning
powder and vinegar, old junk, and sulphur, added to constant ventilation,
proved unequal even to the amelioration of their calamities, while they
were in the latitude of _great heat_. After the removal of the sick, the
ship was disburthened of her stores, ballast, &c. cleansed and
white-washed throughout; still new cases occurred for nearly two months.
Some days, two, three, or four were sent off to the hospital, which would
seem to indicate the retention of some portion of this noxious principle,
which was lodged beyond the reach of the cleansing process." That this
noxious principle or matter existed in the ship, and not in the bodies of
the crew, is evident from its not having been communicated, in a single
instance by a hundred of them who were sent to an hospital on
Rhode-Island, notwithstanding an intercourse sufficient to propagate it
was necessarily kept up with the inhabitants. Even their nurses did not
take it[31].
[29] Medicina Nautica, p. 360.
[30] Annals of Medicine, vol. i. p. 116.
[31] Medical Repository, vol. iv. No. 1.
5. A fifth instance in which contagion has been supposed to take place in
the yellow fever is, where the exhalation from the excretions of a
patient in that disease acts as an _exciting_ cause, in persons
previously impregnated with the marsh, or other external miasmata, which
produce it. The activity of this exhalation, even when it is attended
with no smell, is so great, as to induce sickness, head-ach, vertigo, and
fainting. It is not peculiar to the exhalations from such patients to
produce morbid effects upon persons who visit them. The odour emitted by
persons in the confluent small-pox has been known to produce the same
symptoms, together with a subsequent fever and apthous sore throat. This
has been remarked long ago by Dr. Lind, and latterly by Dr. Willan, in
his Reports of the Diseases of London[32]. That the yellow fever is often
excited in this way, without the intervention of a supposed specific
contagion, I infer from its sometimes spreading through whole families,
who have breathed the same impure atmosphere with the person first
infected by the fever. This is more especially the case where the
impression made by the exhalation from the sick person is assisted by
fear, fatigue, or anxiety of mind in other branches of the family. In
favour of this mode of exciting the yellow fever, Dr. Otto communicated
to me the following fact. In the autumn of the year 1798, it prevailed
upon the _shores_ of the Delaware, in Gloucester county, in New-Jersey. A
mild remittent prevailed at the same time on the _high_ grounds, a few
miles from the river. During this time, the doctor observed, if a person
who had inhaled the seeds of the yellow fever in Philadelphia afterwards
came into a family _near_ the river, the same disease appeared in several
instances in one or more branches of that family; but where persons
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account