Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
To Dr. _Maclean_, however, the medical world are certainly greatly
indebted, for had not his _Researches_ been published, it is more than
probable that the question of Contagion would not have received the many
able elucidations which the experience and science of this country has
since afforded it:[182] nor would an opportunity have occurred by which
the most eminent physicians, and those practically acquainted with the
malady, could have delivered a _viva voce_ opinion before a Committee of
the House of Commons.[183] It may be thought extraordinary that a work,
so unphilosophical as that to which we allude, should have created so
strong a public sensation; but when we consider the eagerness with which
mankind seize any circumstance, however weak, that points towards the
removal of burdens under which they are suffering, we shall cease to
feel surprised that a work of such bold, and promising assertions,
should have soon found its way, through commercial channels, to the
table of the Privy Council; nor is it strange that government, naturally
anxious to relieve commerce of unnecessary burdens, should have
instituted an inquiry to ascertain whether Quarantine regulations were
actually necessary, and how far they might be relaxed with safety to the
country. A report was accordingly requested from the College of
Physicians; who, in order to meet the wishes of the government,
appointed a committee from their own body to undertake the requisite
examination; it is almost unnecessary to state the conclusion at which
they arrived; their report is virtually included in that of the
Committee of the House of Commons (for which _see Appendix, p. 185_.)
With respect to the contagious nature of those fevers which have lately
committed their ravages in these dominions, especially in Ireland, the
proofs appear to be so satisfactory and evident, that we question the
stability of that man’s mind who can doubt, and still more who can deny
it. But although the question of contagion as relating to certain
epidemics appears to be firmly established, we are by no means
insensible to the difficulties and anomalies with which the subject is
embarrassed; several of which are so important in relation to Police
legislation, that we feel it necessary to offer a few observations upon
each of the following questions, and which appear to include all the
leading points of controversy.
I. _Are all Epidemic Fevers contagious?_
II. _Does the matter of Contagion require the aid of a certain state
of the air (Pestilential constitution) to give effect to its powers,
and propagation; and to what causes is the decline and cessation of a
contagious pestilence to be attributed?_
III. _Can filth and animal putrefaction generate contagion?_
IV. _Can a Fever produced by fatigue, unwholesome food, &c. be
rendered contagious in its career by animal filth, impure air, &c._
I. _Are all Epidemic Fevers contagious?_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account