Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
The ancient physicians and philosophers undoubtedly believed in the
possibility of super-fœtation; and the Mythology contains a well
characterised example in the instance of Iphicles and Hercules, who were
begat upon Alcmæna, the former by Jupiter, and the latter by Amphitryon.
_Hippocrates_,[411] _Aristotle_,[412] and _Pliny_,[413] entertained no
doubt respecting the fact, and in later times we find that the most
eminent physiologists have sanctioned the same belief, and have been
engaged in recording facts in its support. _Gasper Bauhuin_[414] relates
a case in which a woman at the end of nine months brought forth a dead
child, with a deformed head, and that six weeks afterwards she was
delivered of a well formed child which lived. _Buffon_[415] presents us
with a still more striking example; a woman of Charles-town, in South
Carolina, was delivered in 1714 of twins, which came into the world one
directly after the other, but to the great surprise of the midwife, one
was black and the other white; the woman herself, considering this proof
of her infidelity too obvious to be denied, admitted the truth without
hesitation,—that shortly after having enjoyed the embraces of her
husband, a black servant entered her room, and by threats accomplished
his purpose. _Aristotle_[416] speaks of an adultress who produced at the
same birth two sons, the one of which resembled the husband, and the
other the lover; _Pliny_[417] also relates several cases of
super-fœtation, some of which are certainly no other than twin cases,
and the others are merely copied from Aristotle. _Musa Brassavolus_[418]
has the following remarkable observation upon the subject. “_Nos vidimus
super-fœtationem quandoque fuisse epidemicam affectionem._”
_Zacchias_[419] also believes in the phenomenon; and in the case of one
_Laurette Polymnie_, his testimony secured for her child the rights of
inheritance; _Harvey_[420] likewise relates a case of super-fœtation, to
which we beg to refer the reader; _Haller_[421] expresses his opinion in
the following words: “_Os uteri nunquam clausum est; ideoque potest
super-fœtari non solum a die sexto ad trigessimum, aut primis duobus
mensibus, sed omni omnino tempore._” _Zacchias_[422] however, thinks
that it can only take place in the first two months of pregnancy, for
that after this period, the developement of the fœtus renders it
impossible. _Plouquet_ observes, that immediately after a first
conception, a second may easily take place, but that after a few months
it can only occur under the most extraordinary circumstances. If time
and space would allow we might adduce a considerable mass of similar
testimony, but we shall conclude this part of the subject with the
opinion of _Kannegeiser_, “_De super-fœtationis existentia rationis
quippe principiis, atque infinitis hominum et brutorum exemplis abunde
comprobatu, Medicis atque jurisconsultis mens vix amplius hæret in
ambiguo._”[423] The best authenticated case of super-fœtation that has
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account