Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
Hull_, well known for his
controversial zeal on these subjects, has offered some remarks so
judicious and important, that it would be an act of injustice to
withhold them from the reader. “The propriety of inducing premature
labour,” says he, “in any deformed woman, can rarely, if ever, be
determined upon before the crotchet has been found indispensably
necessary, and actually employed in a previous labour; indeed, unless
the contraction of the tube or canal of the pelvis be very considerable
and pretty accurately ascertained, it will scarcely be justifiable in
any case to have recourse to this practice in all the subsequent
pregnancies, until the woman has been delivered a second, or third time,
by the crotchet; for it has happened in a very great number of
instances, that a woman who has been delivered of her first child by the
perforator and crotchet, has been afterwards delivered of one or more
living children, at the full time; this observation is made not to
discountenance the inducing of premature labour, but to prevent the
abuse of it.” _Dr. Merriman_, whose extensive practice, and generally
acknowledged judgment, stamp a peculiar value upon his opinions, has
also pointed out the limitations and cautions which he deems necessary
to be observed, to render this operation safe and eligible,[448] and he
concludes by observing that “_a regard to his own character should
determine the accoucheur, not to perform this operation, unless some
other respectable practitioner has seen the patient, and has
acknowledged that the operation is advisable_.”
Q. 12. _What circumstances will justify the Cesarean Operation, and of
what value is the section of the Symphysis Pubis, or Sigaultian
operation?_
Where the size of the pelvis[449] will not admit the passage of the
child, surgical aid is indispensably necessary; but, says _Dr.
Merriman_,[450] it becomes every man to set out with a determination
that he will not hastily, nor without due cause, have recourse to
instrumental assistance;[451] for he may assure himself that if he were
easily to yield to his own apprehensions, or to the expressions of alarm
by the attendants in the lying-in chamber, and in consequence were to
try to expedite the delivery by his instruments, he would, on very many
occasions, do irreparable injury to the parent or her child.
Instrumental delivery resolves itself into three classes,—
1. _Where neither the mother nor the child is of necessity injured_, as
by the use of the FORCEPS[452] and LEVER.[453]
2. _Where the mutilation of the child is the principal object_, as by
the PERFORATOR and CROTCHET.
3. _Where the mother is wounded_, as in the CÆSAREAN and SIGAULTIAN
operations.
It is of the latter class we have now to speak.
_Of the Cæsarean Operation_:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account