Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 1 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
Traité de Med. Leg. T. i. Introduct. xxxiv.
Footnote 38:
Recueil periodique de la Société de Médecine, tom. vii, p. 343.
Footnote 39:
Les Lois eclairées par les Sciences Physiques; ou Traité de Médecine
Légale, et d’Hygiène Publique, tom. iii. 8vo, Paris.
Footnote 40:
Médecine Légale, et Police Médicale, de _P. A. O. Mahon_, Professeur
de Med. Leg. etc. avec quelques notes de _M. Fautrel_.
Footnote 41:
Cours de Médecine Légale, Theoretique et Pratique, de _J. J. Belloc_,
Chirurgien à Agen, 1 vol. in 12mo.
Footnote 42:
Manuel d’Autopsie cadaverique Medico-Legale, &c. 2 vol.
Footnote 43:
Traité de Médecine Légale et d’Hygiène Publique, ou de Police de
Santé, par _F. E. Foderé_, Docteur en Médecine.
Footnote 44:
Toxocologie Générale considérée, sous les Rapports de la Physiologie,
de la Pathologie, et de la Medicine Légale.
Footnote 45:
Leçons faisant Partie du Cours de Médecine Legale, de _M. Orfila_. A
Paris, 1821.
Footnote 46:
La Médecine Légale, relative a l’Art des Accouchemens, par _J.
Capuron_, Docteur en Médecine, &c. Paris, 1821.
Footnote 47:
“Elements of Medical Jurisprudence, or a succinct and compendious
description of such tokens in the human body as are requisite to
determine the judgment of a Coroner and Courts of Law, in cases of
Divorce, Rape, Murder, &c.; to which are added Directions for
preserving the Public Health; by _Samuel Farre_, M.D.” 12mo. p.p. 139.
Footnote 48:
“Elements of Juridical or Forensic Medicine; for the use of medical
men, coroners, and barristers,” by _George Edward Male_, M.D. Second
edition. London, 1818. The first edition of the above work was
published under the title of “Epitome,” in the earlier part of 1816.
Footnote 49:
See Vol. i. p. 125. _Note._
Footnote 50:
For a striking illustration of this truth we have only to refer the
reader to the facts detailed in the note at page 102, in the first
volume of the present work.
Footnote 51:
_Sir Thomas Browne_ was, upon this occasion, called upon by _Sir
Matthew Hale_ to give his judgment; upon which he declared, that “he
was clearly of opinion that the fits were natural, but heightened by
the devil, co-operating with the malice of the witches, at whose
instance he did the villainies,” and he added, “that in Denmark there
had been lately a great discovery of witches who used the very same
way of afflicting persons by conveying pins into them.” This relation
of _Sir Thomas Browne_, says the historian of the case, made that good
and great man, _Sir Matthew Hale_, doubtful; but he would not so much
as sum up the evidence, but left it to the jury with prayers that the
great God of Heaven would direct their hearts in that weighty matter.
The jury accordingly returned a verdict of guilty; and their execution
was amongst the latest instances of the kind that disgrace the English
annals.
Footnote 52:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account