Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
examined by the censors _de scientiâ suâ in facultate suâ in medicin’
administrand’. Et quia præd’ Thomas Bonham sic examinatus minus apte &
insufficienter in præd’ arte medicinæ respondebat, & inventus fuit super
examinationem præd’ per præed’ præsident’ censores minus insufficiens &
inexpert’ ad artem medicinæ administrand’ ac pro eo quod præd’ Tho.
Bonham multoties ante tunc examinatus, & interdictus per præsident’ &
censores, de causis præd’ ad artem medicinæ administrand’ per unum
mensem et amplius post talem interdictionem facultatem illam in Lond’
præd’ sine licentia, &c. ideo adtunc & ibid’ consideratum fuit per præd’
præsident’ censores, quod præd’ Thomas Bonham pro inobedientia et
contempt’ suis præd’ amerciaretur to 100s. in proximis comitiis præd’
præsident’ et collegii persolvend’ et deinceps abstineret, &c. quousque
inventus fuerit sufficiens, &c. sub pœna conjiciendi in carcerem si in
præmissis delinqueret_. And that the said T. Bonham, 20 Octo. 1606,
within London did practice physic, and the same day he was summoned by
the censors to appear before the president and them, 22 Octob. then next
following, at which day Bonham made default: _ideo consideratum fuit per
præd’ censores_, that for his disobedience and contempt he should be
amerced to 10l. and that he should be arrested and committed to custody;
and afterward, 7 Nov. 1606, the said T. Bonham, at their assembly came
before the president and censors, and they asked him if he would satisfy
the college for his disobedience and contempt, and submit himself to be
examined, and obey the censure of the college, who answered, that he had
practised and would practise physic within London, _nulla a collegio
petita venia_, and that he would not submit himself to the president and
censors, and affirmed, that the president and censors, had no authority
over those who were doctors in the university; for which cause, the said
four censors, _sc._ Dr. Turner, Dr. Moundford, Dr. Argent, and Dr. Dun,
then being censors or governors, _pro offensis et inobedientia præd’
adtunc & ib’ ordinaverunt & decreverunt, quod præd’ T. Bonham in
carcerem mandaretur ib’ remansur’ quousque abinde per præsident’ &
censores, seu gubernatores collegii præd’ pro tempore existen’
deliberaretur_, and there then by their warrant in writing, under their
common seal, did commit the plaintiff to the prison of the Compter of
London, &c. _absque ballio sive manucapt’ ad custagia & onera ipsius T.
Bonham, donec præd’ T. Bonham per præcept’ præsiden’ & censor’ collegii
præd’ sive successor’ suor’ liberatus esset_; and Dr. Atkins then
president, and the censors, and Bowden and Taylor as their servants and
by the commandment of the said president and censors, did carry the
plaintiff with the warrant, to the gaol, &c. which is the same
imprisonment. The plaintiff replied and said, that by the said act of 14
H. 8. it was further enacted, “And where that in the dioceses of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account