Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
statute by his practice, unless he practises it by the space of a month.
But the clause of _non bene exequendo, &c._ doth not prescribe any
certain time, but at what time soever he ministers physic _non bene,
&c._ he shall be punished by the said second branch: and the law hath
great reason in making this distinction, for divers nobles,
[133]gentlemen, and others, come upon divers occasions to London, and
when they are here they become subject to diseases, and thereupon they
send for their physicians in the country, who know their bodies, and the
cause of their diseases; now it was never the meaning of the act to bar
any one of his own physician; and when he is here he may practise and
minister to another by two or [134]three weeks, &c. without any
forfeiture; for any one who practises physic _bene, &c._ in London
(although he has not taken any degree in any of the universities) shall
forfeit nothing, unless he practises it by the space of a month; and
that was the reason that the time of a month was put in the act. 4. The
censors cannot be [135]judges, ministers, and parties; judges to give
sentence or judgment; ministers to make summons; and parties to have the
moiety of the forfeiture, _quia [136]aliquis non debet esse Judex in
propriâ causâ, imo iniquum est aliquem suæ rei esse judicem_; and one
cannot be judge and attorney for any of the parties, Dyer 3 E. 6. 65. 38
E. 3. 15. 8 H. 6. 19. b. 20. a. 21 E. 4. 47. a. &c. And it appears in
our books, that in many cases, the common law will [137]controul acts of
Parliament, and sometimes adjudge them to be utterly void: for when an
act of Parliament is against common right and reason, or repugnant, or
impossible to be performed, the common law will controul it, and adjudge
such act to be void: and therefore in 8 E. 3. 30. a. b. Thomas Tregor’s
case on the statute of W. 2. c. 38. & _artic’ super chartas_, c. 9.
Herle [138]saith, some statutes are made against law and right, which
those who made them perceiving, would not put them in execution: the
stat. of W. 2. [139]c. 21 gives a writ of _Cessavit hæredi petenti super
hæredem tenent’ & super eos quibus alienatum fuerit hujusmodi
tenementum_: and yet it is adjudged in 33 E. 3. [140]_Cessavit_ 42.
where the case was, two coparceners lords, and tenant by fealty and
certain rent, one coparcener had issue and died, the aunt and the niece
shall not join in a _Cessavit_, because the heir [141]shall not have a
_Cessavit_ for the cesser in the time of his ancestor, F. N. B. 209. F.
and therewith agrees Plow. Com. 110. a. and the reason is, because in a
_Cessavit_ the tenant before judgment may render the arrearages and
damages, &c. and retain his land, and that he cannot do when the heir
brings a _Cessavit_ for the cesser in the time of his ancestor, for the
arrearages incurred in the life of the ancestor do not belong to the
heir: and because it would be against common right and reason, the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account