Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
The College of Physicians are without doubt more competent Judges of the
Qualifications of a Physician than the Universities, and there may be
many good Reasons for taking a particular care of those, that practise
Physick in London.
_William Rose_, Plaintiff } in
_The College of Physicians, London_, Defendants } Error
_15^{th} March, 1703._
In the 10^{th} year of _Hen._ 8. the defendants were incorporated; and,
in the letters patent granted for that purpose, which were confirmed by
stat. 14 and 15 _Hen._ 8. _c._ 5. is, _inter alia_, the following
clause: “_Concessimus, etiam eisdem præsidenti et collegio, seu
communitati, et successoribus suis, quod nemo in dicta civitate, aut per
septem milliaria in circuitu ejusdem, exerceat dictum facultatem, nisi
ad hoc perdict, præsidentem et communitatem, seu successores eorum qui
pro tempore fuerint, admissus sit per ejudem præsidents et collegii
literas sigillo suo communi sigillatas, sub pœna centum solidorum pro
quolibet mense, quo non admissus eandem facultatem exercit, dimidium
inde nobis et hæred. nostris, et dimidium dicto præsidenti et coll.
applicandum._”
The plaintiff, who was an apothecary, and freeman of _London_, attended
one _Seale_, a butcher, in the parish of _Saint Martin in the Fields_,
and made up and administered proper medicines to him; but, without any
licence from the faculty, and also without the direction of any
physician, and without taking or demanding any fee for his advice.
The defendants apprehending this conduct to be an infringement of their
privileges, brought their action against the plaintiff, to recover the
penalty of 5_l._ _per_ month, under the above clause in their charter;
and, on the trial, the jury found a special verdict, stating the
charter, the confirmatory statute, and the facts of the case; and
submitted to the Court, whether the defendant _Rose_ did practice
physic, within the intent of the letters patent and act of
Parliament.—And, after this verdict had been three several times argued
in the Court of Queen’s Bench, the Judges were unanimously of opinion,
that _the facts found did amount to the practising physic, within the
meaning of the act of Parliament_; and gave judgment accordingly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account