Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
The affidavits in answer to the rule disclosed the following (among
other) facts. For two hundred years past there have been three classes
of persons practising physic in _London_ and seven miles round; the
fellows; candidates, persons desirous of becoming members and who have
been examined and approved by the president and censors to be candidates
for election into the society or fellowship; and the licentiates, who
may practise as fully in all respects as fellows and have the same
benefits and advantages. Various bye-laws have been made by the college
respecting the qualifications of persons to be admitted fellows, one of
them so long ago as 1637, by which it was ordained that no person should
be admitted a fellow unless he had performed all his exercises and
disputations in one of our universities without dispensation, and which
has continued ever since with some little alterations. To prevent any
mistakes arising from the words “_aliquâ Britanniæ Academiâ_” in some of
the bye-laws respecting this qualification, an explanatory bye-law was
made in 1751, in which it was declared that the meaning of the words was
that no person should be admitted who was not a Doctor of Physic of
_Oxford_ or _Cambridge_. The bye-laws of the college have been revised
and altered since the year 1768. By those now in existence no person can
be admitted a fellow unless he has been a candidate for a year, except
in certain cases hereafter mentioned. No person can be admitted into the
class of candidates unless he has been created a Doctor of Physic in the
university of _Oxford_ or _Cambridge_, or unless he has obtained the
same degree in the university of _Dublin_ and has been incorporated into
one of the universities of _Oxford_ or _Cambridge_; nor can any such
person be admitted into the class of candidates until after he has been
examined as to his knowledge of physic in three of the greater or lesser
meetings (called the _comitia majora_ and _comitia minora_) of the
college. After a person has been a candidate for a year, he may be
proposed by the president at one of the greater meetings and admitted a
fellow, if the majority of fellows consent, without further examination.
But by two other bye-laws persons not having the above qualifications
may be proposed in one of two ways; by one, the president is enabled
once in every other year at the _comitia minora_ to propose one
licentiate of ten years standing, who may (if the major part of the
_comitia minora_ consent) be proposed by the president at the next
_comitia majora_ to be elected a fellow, and if the majority of fellows
then present consent, he may then be admitted a fellow. By the other,
any one of the fellows may propose any licentiate, of seven years
standing and of the age of 36, in the _comitia majora_ to be examined;
if the major part of the fellows consent, such licentiate may be
examined by the president or vice-president and censors, and if approved
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account