Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
Your Committee being appointed to consider the validity of the received
doctrines concerning the nature of contagious and infectious diseases,
as distinguished from other epidemics, have proceeded to examine a
number of medical gentlemen, whose practical experience or general
knowledge of the subject appeared to your Committee most likely to
furnish the means of acquiring the most satisfactory information. They
have also had the evidence of a number of persons whose residence in
infected countries, or whose commercial or official employments enabled
them to communicate information as to facts, and on the principle and
efficacy of the laws of Quarantine; all the opinions of the medical men
whom your Committee have examined, with the exception of two, are in
favour of the received doctrine, that the Plague is a disease
communicable by contact only, and different in that respect from
Epidemic fever; nor do your Committee see any thing in the rest of the
evidence they have collected, which would induce them to dissent from
that opinion. It appears from some of the evidence, that the extension
and virulence of the disorder is considerably modified by atmospheric
influence; and a doubt has prevailed whether under any circumstance, the
disease could be received and propagated in the climate of Great
Britain. No fact whatever has been stated to show, that any instance of
the disorder has occurred, or that it has ever been known to have been
brought into the Lazarettos for many years: but your Committee do not
think themselves warranted to infer from thence, that the disease cannot
exist in England; because in the first place, a disease resembling, in
most respects, the Plague, is well known to have prevailed here in many
periods of our history, particularly in 1665-6: and further, it appears
that in many places, and in climates of various nature, the Plague has
prevailed after intervals of very considerable duration.
Your Committee would also observe, down to the year 1800, Regulations
were adopted, which must have had the effect of preventing goods
infected with the Plague from being shipped directly for Britain; and
they abstain from giving any opinion on the nature and application of
the Quarantine regulations, as not falling within the scope of enquiry
to which they have been directed; but they see no reason to question the
validity of the principles upon which such regulations appear to have
been adopted.
_14th June, 1819._
Chorley, M. D. _v._ Bolcot, executor.
(From 4 T. R. p. 317.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account