Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
“Trin. 18 E. 1. Coram rege, rot. 13. Bedford, et M. 22, 23 E. 1. rot. 2.
_In assise by John Radwell against Henry son of Beatrice, who was wife
of Robert Radwell_, quia compertum est, quòd dictus Henricus fuit natus
per 11 dies post 40 septimanas, quod tempus est usitatum mulieribus
pariendi, ex quo prædictus Robertus non habuit accessum ad prædictam
Beatricem per unum mensem ante mortem suam, præsumitur dictum Henricum
esse bastardum, ideo _judgment for the plaintiff_.”
If this state of the case is correct, Lord Coke’s is erroneous in
several particulars of consequence.—1. He is short in not expressing,
that the record mentions _forty weeks_, and so leaving it to be deemed
an _inference_ of his own, as which it hath been accordingly treated.—2.
He exceeds the record, by representing it to stile _that time_ the
_latest_ for a woman’s going with child, when the record only calls it
the _usual_ period.—3. He wholly omits the husband’s having had _no
access to his wife for one month before his death_; a fact very
material, it being very easy to allow _eleven days_ after the _usual_
time, but requiring a strong case to warrant extending such liberality
to nearly _six weeks_.—4. The word _præsumitur_, which Lord Coke passes
over, is of importance; for it indicates, that, notwithstanding the
great excess of time, it was conceived to create only a _presumption_
for the bastardy, and consequently, if very cogent circumstances to
account for the protraction of the birth, and in favour of the wife’s
chastity, had occurred, the judgment might have been for the legitimacy.
So far we had advanced, when on looking into Rolle’s Abridgment, 536. we
found the same ancient case of Radwell more at large, than either in
Lord Coke or Lord Hale.
But Rolle agrees with Lord Coke, as well in respect to the record’s not
mentioning the _forty weeks_, as to its stating the birth to be eleven
days after the _latest time in law for a woman’s going with child_; and
as from Rolle’s particularity he seems to have most minutely attended to
the record, his authority, till the whole record appears, seems most
decisive.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account