Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)Paris, John Ayrton
Science
Medical Jurisprudence, Volume 3 (of 3)
Paris, John Ayrton
Medical laws and legislation -- Great Britain
Dr. _Sloane_ sworn—* * As to my opinion of drowning it is plain, that if
a great quantity of water be swallowed into the stomach by the gullet,
it will not suffocate or drown the person: Drunkards who swallow a great
deal of liquor, and those who are forced by the civil law to drink a
great quantity of water, which in giving the question (as it is called)
is poured into them by way of torture to make them confess crimes, have
no suffocation or drowning happen to them: But on the other hand, when
any quantity comes into the wind-pipe, so as it does hinder or intercept
inspiration, or coming in of the air, which is necessary for inspiration
or breathing, the person is suffocated. Such a small quantity will do,
as sometimes in prescriptions, when people have been very weak, or
forced to take medicines, I have observed some spoonfuls in that
condition (if it went the wrong way) to have choaked or suffocated the
person. I take drowning in a great measure to be thus, and when one
struggles he may, to save himself from being choaked, swallow some
quantity of water, yet that is not the cause of his death, but that
which goes into the wind-pipe and lungs. Whether a person comes dead or
alive into the water, I believe some quantity will go into the
wind-pipe; and I believe without force after death, little will get into
the stomach, because that it should, swallowing is necessary, which
after death cannot be done. * * *
Baron _Hatsell_. But what do you say to this? if there had been water in
the body, would it not have putrified the parts after it had lain six
weeks.
Dr. _Sloane_. My Lord, I am apt to think it would have putrified the
stomach less than the lungs, because the stomach is a part of the body
that is contrived by nature partly to receive liquids; but the
contrivance of the lungs is only for the receiving of air; they being of
a spongy nature, the water might sink more into them than the stomach;
but I believe it might putrify there too after some time. I am apt to
think, that when a body is buried under ground, according to the depth
of the grave, and difference of the weather and soil, the fermentation
may be greater or lesser, and that according to the several kinds of
meats or liquids in the stomach, the putrifaction will likewise vary so
that it seems to me to be very uncertain.
Baron _Hatsell_. But when they are in a coffin, how is it then?
Dr. _Sloane_. No doubt there will be a fermentation more or less,
according as the air comes more or less to the body. Indeed it may be
otherwise where the air is wholly shut out, which is supposed to be the
way of embalming, or preserving of dead bodies of late, without the use
of any spices, which is thought in a great measure to be brought about
by the closeness of the coffin, and hindering of the air from coming
into the body.
Question (by the Prisoner). Is it possible, in your judgment, for any
water to pass into the thorax?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account