“There are probably few persons who did not learn with regret the
decision of the Edinburgh Senatus in respect of the Hope Scholarships.
It is not pleasant that such a story of, at least, seeming injustice
should circulate through foreign universities, to the discredit of
our own, for there cannot be much doubt as to the view that will
be taken of the case by those nations--now forming the majority in
Europe--who have admitted women to their medical colleges on terms of
exact fairness and equality with their other students.... A medical
contemporary argues that this affair proves how unwise it was to
admit women to the University of Edinburgh--such admission being, as
is asserted, the natural source of ‘constant squabbles.’ But most
unprejudiced people, judging the case at first sight, would surely
rather see here the evil of a partial, restricted, and permissive
legislation. If women have a claim to medical education at all, they
have exactly the same claim as men; if they are to be received as
students at all, they must certainly be treated with even-handed
justice, and not as social or rather academical _pariahs_, to whom
the bare crumbs of instruction are vouchsafed as a grace and bounty;
while all the honours and rewards are to be reserved to their male
competitors. Looking at the thing for a moment, merely in the
interests of the young men, and as a question of expediency, we cannot
imagine anything much worse for their moral guidance than to find that
women are indeed to compete with them, but so shackled that they can
never win; or rather that, if they do win, the prizes will be snatched
from their grasp and given to men whom they have beaten. We have heard
that, in both classes where the ladies have this year studied, a very
unusual access of zeal and energy has been noticed among the gentlemen
in the other section of the class--a happy effect of such competition,
which has often been observed in the mixed colleges of America, and
which surely need not be neutralised here by the providence of the
Senatus.”
_Scotsman_, April 15, 1870.
“The Senatus has, by a small majority, confirmed Professor Crum
Brown’s decision with regard to Miss Pechey and the Hope Scholarship,
on the grounds previously presumed by us. But these grounds, if so
they may be called, are in our opinion insufficient to deprive Miss
Pechey of the Scholarship. Whatever may be our views regarding the
advisability of ladies studying medicine, the University of Edinburgh
professed to open its gates to them on equal terms with the other
students; and unless some better excuse be forthcoming in explanation
of the decision of the Senatus, we cannot help thinking that the
University has done no less an injustice to itself than to one of its
most distinguished students.”
_British Medical Journal_, April 16, 1870.
NOTE J, p. 96.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account