“3. That the only hospital in Edinburgh possessing the required
qualifications is the Royal Infirmary, and that exclusion from that
institution would therefore preclude the possibility of our continuing
our course of medical study in this city.
“4. That, in the present state of divided opinion on the subject, it
is possible that such a consummation may give satisfaction to some;
but we cannot suppose that your honourable Board would wish to put
yourselves in the attitude of rendering null and void the decisions
of the authorities of the University of which we are matriculated
students, and of the School of the College of Physicians and Surgeons,
where we are now attending the classes of anatomy and surgery.
“5. That it has been the invariable custom of the Managers to grant
tickets of admission to students of the University and of Surgeons’
Hall, and that, as far as we are aware, no statute of the Infirmary
limits such admission to students of one sex only.
“6. That the advertised terms on which the wards of the Infirmary
are open to all registered and matriculated students were such as to
leave no doubt on our minds that we should be admitted; if, therefore,
our exclusion should be finally determined, we shall suffer great
pecuniary loss and damage by this departure of the Managers from their
advertised regulations.
“7. That if we are granted admission to the Infirmary by your
honourable Board, there are physicians and surgeons on the hospital
staff who will gladly afford us the necessary clinical instruction,
and find no difficulty in doing so. In support of the above assertion,
we beg to enclose the accompanying papers, marked A. and B.
“8. That we are fellow-students of systematic and theoretical surgery
with the rest of Dr Watson’s class in Surgeons’ Hall, and are
therefore unable to see what legitimate objection can be raised to our
also attending with them his hospital visit.
“9. That a large proportion of the patients in the Infirmary being
women, and women being present in all the wards as nurses, there can
be nothing exceptional in our presence there as students.
“10. That in our opinion no objection can be raised to our attending
clinical teaching, even in the male wards, which does not apply with
at least equal force to the present instruction of male students in
the female wards.
“11. That we are unable to believe it to be in consonance with the
wishes of the majority of the subscribers and donors to the Infirmary
(among whom are perhaps as many women as men) that its educational
advantages should be restricted to students of one sex only, when
students of the other sex also form part of the regular medical
classes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account