Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Medieval
which Alphorabius[49] in his book on the division of the
_scientiæ_ puts last among the parts of _logica_, and which in
his book on the origin of the _scientiæ_ he describes thus:
“_Poetica_ is the lore of ordering meters according to the
proportion of words (dictiones) and the times of feet and of
their rhythms (numeri).” Again he says in the former book: “It
belongs to _poetica_ to make the hearer through its locutions
image something as fair or foul which is not so,[50] that he
may believe and shun or desire it. Although certainly it is
not so in truth, nevertheless, the minds of hearers are roused
to shun or desire what they image.” Moreover poetry has seven
species: _comedia_, _tragedia_, _invectio_, _satyra_, _fabula_,
_historia_, _argumentum_.[51] _Comedia_ is poetry reversing a
sad beginning by a glad end; but _tragedia_ is poetry lapsing
from a glad beginning to a sad end (109). The function, then,
of the poet is in this, that with a certain beauty he converts
actual events into other species by his slanting figures (end
of 110).
Except meter, which belongs under _grammatica_, and the two forms of
drama, which are not thought of as forms of composition, there is nothing
to distinguish this poetic from rhetoric.
3. St. Bonaventure _de Reductione Artium ad Theologiam_
St. Bonaventure[52] distinguishes four “lights”: (1) the exterior light
of a manual art, illuminating with regard to artistic form; (2) the
inferior light of knowledge through the senses, illuminating with regard
to the patterns of nature; (3) the interior light of philosophical
knowledge, illuminating with regard to truth comprehended intellectually;
(4) the superior light of grace and revelation, illuminating with regard
to truth as a means of salvation.[53] For (3), the “interior light,” his
division is stated first in its commonest form. _Philosophia_ is: (a)
_rationalis_ (i.e., _sermonum_), (b) _naturalis_ (i.e., _rerum_), (c)
_moralis_ (i.e., _morum_). This division[54] he then repeats in another
form and order:
(a) _physica_, for knowing the causes of being;
(b) _logica_, for knowing the theory of understanding;
(c) _practica_, for knowing the conduct of living.
Finally he considers it in a third aspect. The domain of _moralis_
is motive; of _physica_ is self-limited and self-sufficient; of
_sermocinalis_ is interpretation. The last item he subdivides into:
_grammatica_, for expression, regarding reason as apprehension,
seeking the appropriate;
_logica_, for instruction, regarding reason as judgment,
seeking the true;
_rhetorica_, for persuasion, regarding reason as motive,
seeking the ornate.[55]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account