Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative worksBaldwin, Charles Sears
History
Medieval rhetoric and poetic to 1400 : $b Interpreted from representative works
Baldwin, Charles Sears
Literature, Medieval -- History and criticism; Poetics -- History -- To 1500; Rhetoric, Medieval
The habitual use of the _Song of Songs_ as symbolic of the Christ and
his Church reminds us that symbolism is essentially poetic. It was
the usual poetic of medieval preaching in interpreting not only the
Scriptures, but all human experience. As behind the word lay spiritual
meaning, so behind the veil of the senses lay the realities of life.
The so-called “otherworldliness” of medieval preaching is no ignoring
of physical facts; it is a sustained and consistent call to see through
them. What medieval philosophy defined as seeing “in the aspect of
eternity” (_sub specie æternitatis_) medieval preaching inculcated as a
habit of vision. The habit might, indeed, degenerate, as in that popular
manual of the fourteenth century, the _Speculum humanæ salvationis_,[31]
into extravagance or minute formalism; but even so it kept some view of
history as a providential progress. It might rise, on the other hand,
to express the immediate apprehension of the mystic, the vision of
spiritual genius. But the distinction of the medieval mystic is rather
in degree than in kind. The whole age is characteristically habituated to
mysticism. No other poetic vision is equal to Dante’s; but no other form
of poetry in his age, whether in verse or in sermon, is commoner than the
vision.
Not only to the rapt was the visible world eloquent of the unseen eternal.
Full, indeed, is everything of supernal mysteries, abounding
each in its special sweetness if the eye that beholds be but
attentive, as of him who knows how to suck honey from the
stone and oil from the hardest rock. St. Bernard, _De Laudibus
Virginis Matris_, I. 1; PL 183: 56.
In the following sermon of this series St. Bernard refers seriatim to
the accepted prefigurations of the Blessed Virgin. She is the perennial
antagonist of the serpent (Genesis iii. 15), the _mulier fortis_ of
Solomon (Proverbs xxxi. 10), the burning bush (Exodus iii. 2), Aaron’s
budding rod (Numbers xvii. 8), Isaiah’s rod from the root of Jesse (xi.
1), the rod that smote the rock (Exodus xvii. 6) and divided the sea
(Exodus xiv. 16), Gideon’s fleece (Judges vi. 37-40), the woman who is
the Lord’s new creation (Jeremiah xxxi. 22). The prefigurations of this
list had an obvious appeal in sermons through being familiar in hymns, in
sculpture, in glass. Evidently St. Bernard loved them for their poetry;
but he is also convinced of their sanction. He even formulates the theory
of symbolic prefiguration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account