Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-TonPeacock, Thomas Love
General
Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-Ton
Peacock, Thomas Love
English fiction -- 19th century; Orangutans -- Fiction; Satire
_Quarterly Review_, No. xxxi. p. 249. The reader will be reminded of
_Croaker_ in the fourth act of the _Good-natured Man_: ‘Blood and
gunpowder in every line of it. Blown up! murderous dogs! all blown up!
(_Reads._) “Our pockets are low, and money we must have.” Ay, there’s
the reason: they’ll blow us up _because they have got low pockets_....
Perhaps this moment I’m treading on lighted matches, blazing
brimstone, and barrels of gunpowder. They are preparing to blow me up
into the clouds. Murder!... Here, John, Nicodemus, search the house.
Look into the cellars, to see if there be any combustibles below, and
above in the apartments, that no matches be thrown in at the windows.
_Let all the fires be put out_, and let the _engine_ be drawn out in
the yard, to _play upon the house_ in case of necessity.’—_Croaker_
was a deep politician. The _engine_ to _play_ upon the _house_: mark
that!
Footnote 114:
This illustration of the old fable of the mouse and the mountain falls
short of an exhibition in the Honourable House, on the 29th of January
1817; when Mr. Canning, amidst a tremendous denunciation of the
parliamentary reformers, and a rhetorical chaos of storms, whirlwinds,
rising suns, and twilight assassins, produced in proof of his
charges—_Spence’s Plan!_ which was received with an _éclat_ of
laughter on one side, and shrugs of surprise, disappointment, and
disapprobation on the other. I can find but one parallel for the Right
Honourable Gentleman’s dismay:
So having said, awhile he stood, expecting
Their universal shout and high applause
To fill his ear; when contrary he hears
On all sides, from innumerable tongues,
A dismal universal hiss, the sound
Of public scorn.—_Paradise Lost_, x. 504.
This Spencean chimaera, which is the very foolishness of folly, and
which was till lately invisible to the naked eye of the political
entomologist, has since been subjected to a _lens_ of _extraordinary
power_, under which, like an insect in a microscope, it has appeared a
formidable and complicated monster, all bristles, scales, and claws,
with a ‘husk about it like a chestnut’: _horridus, in jaculis et pelle
Libystidis ursae!_
Footnote 115:
_Quarterly Review_, No. xxxi. p. 271.
Footnote 116:
_Ibid._
Footnote 117:
_Ibid._ p. 258.
Footnote 118:
_Ibid._
Footnote 119:
_Ibid._ p. 273.
Footnote 120:
_Quarterly Review_, No. xxxi. p. 276.
Footnote 121:
_Ibid._ p. 260.
Footnote 122:
_Ibid._ p. 192.
Footnote 123:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account