Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-TonPeacock, Thomas Love
General
Melincourt : $b or, Sir Oran Haut-Ton
Peacock, Thomas Love
English fiction -- 19th century; Orangutans -- Fiction; Satire
communicated to me, but with manifest reluctance, that they were in
imminent danger of being deprived of their miserable furniture, and
turned out of their wretched habitation, by Lawrence Litigate, Esquire,
their landlord, for arrears of rent amounting to five pounds.
_Mr. Forester._ Which, of course, you paid?
_Mr. Fax._ I did so; but I do not see that it is of course.
Mr. Forester, Mr. Fax, and Sir Oran were still leaning over the gate of
the cottage, when a peasant came whistling along the road. ‘Pray, my
honest friend,’ said Mr. Fax, ‘can you inform me what has become of the
family which inhabited this cottage two years ago?’—‘Ye’ll voind them,’
said the peasant, ‘about a mile vurther an, just by the lake’s edge
like, wi’ two large elms by the door, and a vir tree.’ He resumed his
tune and his way.
The philosophical trio proceeded on their walk.
_Mr. Forester._ You have said little of his wife.
_Mr. Fax._ She was an interesting creature. With her the feelings of
misfortune had subsided into melancholy silence, while with him they
broke forth in misanthropical satire.
_Mr. Forester._ And their children?
_Mr. Fax._ They would have been fine children, if they had been better
clothed and fed.
_Mr. Forester._ Did they seem to repent their marriage?
_Mr. Fax._ Not for themselves. They appeared to have no wish but to live
and die together. For their children, indeed, I could easily perceive
they felt more grief than they expressed.
_Mr. Forester._ You have scarcely made out your case. Poverty had
certainly come in at the door, but Love does not seem to have flown out
at the window. You would not have prevailed on them to separate at the
price of living in palaces. The energy of intellect was not deadened;
the independence of spirit was not broken. The participation of love
communicates a luxury to sorrow, that all the splendour of selfishness
can never bestow. If, as has been said, a friend is more valuable than
the elements of fire and water, how much more valuable must be the one
only associate, the more than friend, to him whom in affliction and in
poverty all other friends have abandoned! If the sun shines equally on
the palace and the cottage, why should not love, the sun of the
intellectual world, shine equally on both? More needful, indeed, is its
genial light to the latter, where there is no worldly splendour to
diminish or divide its radiance.
[Illustration: _Sir Oran sat down in the artist’s seat._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account