Memoir and Correspondence of Caroline HerschelHerschel, John, Mrs.
History
Memoir and Correspondence of Caroline Herschel
Herschel, John, Mrs.
Herschel, Caroline Lucretia, 1750-1848
I feel very great gratification at recollecting that some twenty years
ago I had the pleasure of being present when you were conversing at
Slough with my dear brother, for it encourages me to address you now as
an old friend, and I might almost say my only one, for death has not
spared me one of those valuable men of the last century in whose society
I had an opportunity of spending many happy hours, when they came to
pass an astronomical night at Bath, Datchet, Clay Hall, and Slough. And
I should now in the absence of my nephew (who would in my name have
properly answered your kind letter for me) been much at a loss how to
reply to yours of March 17. But I hope, dear Sir, you will have the
goodness to return my sincere thanks to the Council of the Society for
voting me a complete copy of their Memoirs. But, considering my advanced
age and declining health, I think it best not to have them sent over to
me, for it would cause me much uneasiness to leave them in the hands of
those who could neither read nor understand them.
I suppose my nephew must have himself a complete copy of the Memoirs;
but, if not, I beg you will give them to him, along with my love, as a
keepsake from his affectionate and grateful aunt, the first opportunity
you have to see him on his return.
Your kind information of the work with which you are at present engaged,
touches a string which it has caused me no small trouble to silence; for
whenever my thoughts return to those two or three years of which every
moment that could be spared from other immediate astronomical business
was, by my brother’s desire, allotted for comparing each star of the
British Catalogue with their observations in that _incorrect edition_ of
1725, I feel always sorry that want of time, and, perhaps, want of
ability too, must have been the cause of leaving many incorrections
unnoticed. The work, however, was solely intended for the use of my
brother, who valued Flamsteed as an observer too much to have made use
of any other but the British Catalogue for determining the places of his
newly-discovered objects. N.B. We ought to remember that till the year
1790 and 1800, when Wollaston’s and Bode’s Catalogues appeared, we had
no other to go by, for those of Piazzi and several other excellent
observers were then not generally known.
But, dear Sir, I ought to take leave of this to me interesting subject;
for finding, about eight years since, that, on account of the failure of
my eyes and wretched health in general, I should be unable to make
further use of Flamsteed’s works, I gave the three volumes, along with
the Atlas, Catalogue of Omitted Stars, &c., to the Observatory of
Göttingen, all marked throughout with what corrections I knew of at that
time; thinking they might be of use to the observer there, and relieve
me besides from the fear of leaving them where they could not be
appreciated, or an attempt be made to comment on them, and perhaps have
made bad worse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account