Memoir of Hendrick Zwaardecroon, commandeur of Jaffnapatam (afterwards Governor-General of Nederlands India) 1697.: For the guidance of the council of Jaffnapatam, during his absence at the coast of Malabar.Zwaardecroon, Hendrick
History
Memoir of Hendrick Zwaardecroon, commandeur of Jaffnapatam (afterwards Governor-General of Nederlands India) 1697.: For the guidance of the council of Jaffnapatam, during his absence at the coast of Malabar.
Zwaardecroon, Hendrick
Jaffna (Sri Lanka) -- History
With regard to the high grounds northward and southward of the town,
this is not very considerable, and thus not a source of much danger. I
admit, however, that it would be better if they were somewhat lower,
but the surface is so large that I fear it would involve a great
deal of labour and expenditure. In case this were necessary, it would
be just as important that the whole row of buildings right opposite
the fort in the town should be broken down. I do not see the great
necessity for either, while moreover, the soil consists of sand and
stone, which is not easily dug. With regard to the horse stables and
the carpenters' yard just outside the gate of the Castle, enclosed
by a wall, the river, and the moat of the Castle, which is deepest
in that place (although I did not see much water in it), I think it
would have been better if they had been placed elsewhere; but yet I
do not think they are very dangerous to the fort, especially as that
corner can be protected from the points Hollandia and Gelria; while,
moreover, the roof of the stable and the walls towards the fort could
be broken down on the approach of an enemy; for, surely no one could
come near without being observed. As these buildings have been only
newly erected, they will have to be used, in compliance with the
orders from Batavia.
Thus far as to my advice with regard to this fort; but I do not mean to
oppose the proposals of the Commandeur. I will only state here that I
found the moat of unequal breadth, and in some places only half as wide
as it ought to be, of which no mention is made here. In some places
also it is not sufficiently deep to turn the water by banks or keep it
four or five feet high by water-mills. Even if this were so, I do not
think the water could be retained on account of the sandy and stony
soil, especially as there are several low levels near by. Supposing
even that it were possible, the first thing an enemy would do would be
to direct a few shots of the canon towards the sluices, and thus make
them useless. I would therefore recommend that, if possible, the moat
be deepened so far during the south-west monsoon that it would be on a
level with the river, by which four or six feet of water would always
stand in it. With regard to the sowing of thorns, I fear that during
the dry season they would be quite parched and easily take fire. This
proposal shows how little the work at the moat has really advanced,
in fact, when I saw it it was dry and overgrown with grass. So long
as the fort is not surrounded by a moat, I cannot see the necessity
for a drawbridge, but the Honourable the Government of India will
dispose of this matter. Meantime I have had many improvements made,
which I hope will gain the approval of Their Excellencies.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account