Memoir of Rev. Joseph Badger: Fourth EditionHolland, E. G. (Elihu Goodwin)
History
Memoir of Rev. Joseph Badger: Fourth Edition
Holland, E. G. (Elihu Goodwin)
Badger, Joseph, 1792-1852
"That, Sir, which bore with the greatest weight on my mind,
was your manner of introducing this subject before the
people. You say that Mr. Smith, of Boston, is the founder
of the people called Christians, and that I get my doctrine
from his Bible Dictionary. But, Sir, Mr. S. was never the
founder of any doctrine that ever I preached; nor is his
dictionary any more a criterion with me than is that of Mr.
Wood a criterion with you and with your brethren. To me,
Brown's, Barclay's, Butterworth's, Parish's, Smith's, and
Wood's are all alike; there is valuable information, and
there are errors in them all, for which I am wholly
unaccountable. For Mr. Smith's errors I am no more
responsible than you are for Mr. Wood's. I am not his
counsellor. I am accountable, Sir, for no errors but my
own; for these I am willing to answer now and at the
Judgment. Still, I shall notice your quotation of Mr.
Smith's writings, for I esteem them incorrect and unfair.
His writings, some of them, are undoubtedly very erroneous;
so are some of Mr. Wesley's and Mr. Fletcher's; but can
this prove that there is nothing good in them, or that
their writings are all bad? Had I selected some things from
Mr. Wesley's Notes on the New Testament, or some sketches
from the Discipline of the Methodist Episcopal Church, and
told the people that these were the faith of all the
Methodists, I should certainly have been unfair, for many
have discovered greater light and have offered their
dissent from these writings. Yet these men were luminaries
for the day that brought them forth. I would not injure the
kind feelings of my numerous Methodist friends; but what
would Mr. R. say, should I go into a place holding in my
hand Mr. Wesley's sermon on Rom. 8: 21, which proves that
the beasts will go to heaven and share in immortality?--or
his sermon on the Lord's Supper, which proves it right, or
which admits the unconverted to the communion?--then should
I say that Mr. R. believes exactly thus, before I had seen
or heard you, would you not call it unfair? This is the
light in which I view your recent conduct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account