Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-IslandKnowles, James D. (James Davis)
History
Memoir of Roger Williams, the Founder of the State of Rhode-Island
Knowles, James D. (James Davis)
Rhode Island -- History -- Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; Williams, Roger, 1604?-1683
But it has been said, that the Creator could not have designed this vast
and beautiful region to be exclusively inhabited by a few thousands of
savage hunters; and, therefore, if the old world should become crowded
with inhabitants, a portion of them would have a right to remove to
America, and occupy a portion of it, as a part of the great inheritance
of the human race. The Indians would consequently be bound to allow them
a sufficient space; and if the numbers of both parties should so
increase as to make hunting impracticable, the Indians ought to become
cultivators.
If this theory were admitted as sound, the practical application of it
would not be easy. The absolute necessity of emigration from the old
world has not, perhaps, occurred, and yet this case must be made out, to
justify an occupancy of a part of the Indian territory, without the
consent of the natives. Immense tracts of uncultivated land exist in
Europe, and even in England. Why would it not be as just for a company
of settlers to fix their dwellings in a nobleman’s park, cut down his
trees, and plant their corn, as to do the same on the lands of an
Indian? If it were alleged, that the Indian had more land than he
needed, the same might be said, perhaps, of the nobleman. At any rate,
it might be asked, who was the proper judge, how much land an Indian
needed?
But, looking at the actual state of things, at the settlement of this
country, the necessities of the Pilgrims were sufficiently great, to
make it the duty of the Indians to receive them hospitably, and allow
them a portion of their lands. Where the country was deserted by the
natives, the colonists might, undoubtedly, take possession. But wherever
the Indians actually occupied the territory, even for the purposes of
hunting, they were, clearly, the proprietors; and though it was
doubtless their duty to cede to the Europeans a sufficient portion for
their maintenance, yet they could not justly be forced to perform this
duty. The settlers were bound to be satisfied with a sufficient amount
of land for their comfortable support by agriculture and by the arts of
civilized life. But the Indians retained an inviolable right to so much
territory as they deemed necessary for their own use. Their title was
beyond dispute. No power on earth could lawfully dispossess them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account