Memoir of the Services of the Bengal Artillery: From the Formation of the Corps to the Present Time, with Some Account of Its Internal OrganizationBuckle, E. (Edmond)
History
Memoir of the Services of the Bengal Artillery: From the Formation of the Corps to the Present Time, with Some Account of Its Internal Organization
Buckle, E. (Edmond)
India -- History -- British occupation, 1765-1947; India -- History, Military; India. Army. Bengal Artillery
Beatson’s Seringapatam.
Footnote 45:
His brother was one of the council of revenue at Dinagepoor in 1766.
Footnote 46:
There is some unaccountable error in the above. Goddard left Culpee in
May, 1778, with Leslie’s force. He was employed in 1781 at the
Bhoreghat against the Mahrattas, who may have been mistaken for
Rohillas. The detachment with Sir Eyre Coote sailed from Calcutta in
October, 1780. Montague appears on the returns of one of these
companies, but from the circumstantial account of his wound, we must
suppose he went round and joined Goddard, and returned in the end of
1781. The regimental returns are blank from July 1780 to April 1781,
and the companies absent on service are not included till their
return. We had thought that Lieutenant Montague was quarter-master to
the artillery in 1781.—E. B.
Footnote 47:
The following conversation took place between the deputy
adjutant-general and Major Montague as the latter passed headquarters
on his march: “Lord C. has it in contemplation to give Colonel Smith
the command of the artillery to be employed against Severn-droog, and
he wishes to know if that circumstance will be any impediment to your
exertions.” The major replied, “that he did not expect to take the
command; that his only wish was to be employed, and that his lordship
might rely on his utmost exertions for the public service under
Smith.” The deputy adjutant-general did not think that answer
sufficiently explicit; and said, “Lord C. wished to know whether Major
M. could act with more effect when independent of Colonel Smith, than
when under his command?” The major answered, “that he could certainly
carry a plan of his own into execution in the same time that it would
require to suggest and explain it to another.” The deputy
adjutant-general therefore concluded that Major M.’s real opinion was
that he should prefer to conduct the business by himself, and informed
him that his lordship was disposed to give Colonel Smith an
opportunity of knocking down the walls of the place where he had been
so long confined in a former war; but as it might be attended with
some risk to the service, he was at length determined to appoint Major
M. to command and conduct the artillery against that important place,
as the capture of it was absolutely necessary to the further progress
of the campaign.
Footnote 48:
He married a Miss Fleetwood at Masulipatam in 1792, when on his return
to Bengal from the first campaign against Tippoo.
Footnote 49:
The note in a former page may serve to explain this neglect, as the
commanding officer of artillery was the same Colonel Smith to whom he
had been preferred at Severn-droog.
Footnote 50:
Minute by Governor-General, January 19, 1800.—“The conduct of the
artillery and lascars attached to the regiment during the time of its
absence from these provinces is equally entitled to commendation.”
Footnote 51:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account