Frontier and pioneer life -- Oregon; Frontier and pioneer life -- Washington (State)
"The exclusion of the territorial laws since the date of the
convention has been open, manifest, and palpable, and I believe
rightful. Then, if I am correct in my conclusions, no other
laws were in force on the island for the punishment of persons
guilty of murder (not connected with the military), but the
laws of the United States. In fact, it would follow as a
logical sequence, that if the territorial laws were excluded it
would be a place 'under the sole and exclusive jurisdiction of
the United States,' hence, the laws of the United States would
be operative there.
"I can see many cogent reasons why it was desirable to exclude
territorial laws and territorial officials from the island. The
territorial legislature represented but a small fraction of the
American people and was far removed from the power which was
responsible for a state of peace or war, and before measures
could be disapproved by Congress a conflict might be
precipitated. Territorial officers were not responsible,
directly at least, to the supreme power. It had no control over
their official conduct. All will agree that such control ought
to be directly with the responsible power. That could only
exist legitimately, but by the exclusion of the local
jurisdiction and the operation of the national jurisdiction,
modified by express convention or necessary implication.
"It might be very competent and very proper in the
accomplishment of the object in view, for the treaty-making
power to suspend the operations of all laws for the punishment
of offenders save in the cases where the acts were crimes, by
the universal judgment of mankind. The power to suspend or
modify must exist somewhere, or in the case of disputed
jurisdiction, there could be no treaty or conventions.
"All such conventions are founded on the mutual concessions of
the high contracting parties. After the convention has been
signed, the supreme power in our government, in order to secure
its honest and faithful execution, took possession of the
disputed Territory, segregated from its former local
jurisdiction, and administers, modifies, or suspends its own
laws by its own military or judicial agents. The supreme power
acts through its own functions and not through that of an
inferior jurisdiction. It administers its own laws so far as
such administration is not in conflict with the convention. Its
power is ample and it need not borrow from the inferior
jurisdiction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account