Memoirs of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, and of the Court of Queen Anne Vol. 2 (of 2)Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
History
Memoirs of Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough, and of the Court of Queen Anne Vol. 2 (of 2)
Thomson, A. T., Mrs.
Great Britain -- Court and courtiers -- Biography; Marlborough, Sarah Jennings Churchill, Duchess of, 1660-1744
he had received of her merits.
Sir John could add nothing disparaging to the high encomiums which he
had passed on Lady Harriott, and a fresh negociation was accordingly
entered upon with the Duchess, who expressed herself delighted with the
renewal of a treaty which she had considered as finally abandoned. Sir
John, meantime, was very zealous, and the affair proceeded
flourishingly, and ended, eventually, in the marriage of Lady Harriott
and the Duke of Newcastle.[241]
So far Vanburgh seems to have acted well his part of a friend and
mediator; but he soon found that matchmaking was by no means the most
desirable occupation in the world. Although he had, by successful
arguments, brought the Duke of Newcastle “into the mind to marry Lady
Harriott,” the Duchess appears to have acted towards him unhandsomely
and ungratefully. It seems to have been her grace’s mode for avenging
Sir John’s errors of taste and miscalculations at Blenheim, to remove
her confidence from him in the nice affair which he had had her commands
to bring about to another useful friend. Whilst the architect and his
patroness were together at Bath and at Blenheim, she never mentioned a
syllable of the projected marriage to him, but, by transferring the
negociation to one Mr. Walter, implied that Vanburgh was no longer
worthy of the trust she had reposed in him. It was not long before
Vanburgh, indignant at her conduct, addressed to her grace a letter,
explanatory but respectful, excepting when, in the conclusion, he
declares that he should be surprised, but not sorry, to find that she
had imposed her commands and entrusted her commission to some other
person.[242]
The Duchess, in her reply to Sir John Vanburgh, entered distinctly into
the whole process by which the match had been revived and perfected. She
acknowledged her obligations to Sir John Vanburgh; she explained her
conduct, if not satisfactorily, at least graciously; and concluded by
declaring, “that if any third person should say that she had behaved ill
to Sir John, she should be very sorry for it, and should be very ready
even to ask his pardon.”[243]
Before this temperate letter reached him, Sir John Vanburgh, not to his
credit, had sent a very abusive, coarse, and insolent epistle. It
appears that he had discovered that the Duchess had devolved the
completion of Blenheim into other hands. Under the excitement produced
by this discovery, he gave vent to a torrent of invective, which seldom
accompanies a good cause.
The Duchess, as it happened, received this singular ebullition from her
former confidante before her own letter was despatched; whereupon she
took up her pen, and, in the excess of her wrath, added a postscript;
concluding in these words:—“Upon the receiving of that very insolent
letter, upon the eighth of the same month, ’tis easy to imagine that I
wished to have had the civility I expressed in the letter back again,
and was very sorry that I had fouled my fingers in writing to such a
fellow.”[244]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account