Memoirs of the Court of George IV. 1820-1830 (Vol 1): From the Original Family DocumentsBuckingham and Chandos, Richard Plantagenet Temple Nugent Brydges Chandos Grenville, Duke of
History
Memoirs of the Court of George IV. 1820-1830 (Vol 1): From the Original Family Documents
Buckingham and Chandos, Richard Plantagenet Temple Nugent Brydges Chandos Grenville, Duke of
Great Britain -- History -- George IV, 1820-1830
The communication you have made to me is not a matter of surprise,
for I own I expected this would be the result. The proposition,
however, being now made by one Cabinet Minister to Lord Grenville,
and communicated by another to you, see how I should stand
committed if I were to meddle with it by asking an interview with
Lord Liverpool. In the former case Lord Liverpool opened the
proposition to me, and it was my duty to lay it before you, even
before I spoke to Lord Grenville; but in this case Wynn has
informed you of it, and he would have a right to demand why I
presumed to communicate at all with Lord Liverpool without his
authority or permission, on a subject so deeply involving his
interests and wishes. By his communication to you, he has entitled
you to write to Lord Liverpool, as you have done to Canning,
expressly stating your views and feelings on the subject; and I am
witness that a station in the Government was undoubtedly one of the
primary objects of your contemplation in the former negotiation. I
have no doubt that if I were to see Lord Liverpool, even under your
authority, he would treat it as a Cabinet question, and refuse to
enter into any discussion with me upon it, but I am quite sure I
could not discuss it without touching upon the views and objects of
Charles Wynn in a way that might offend him; it is an object of
such moment and importance to him, that I cannot be surprised that
he receives it so favourably. I heard from him the moment he came
to town, telling me he was quite sure the Directors would not
nominate him, but he says nothing of the new proposal, and probably
it had not then been made, or if so, he did not choose to confide
it to me. With regard to the advantages the Government derived from
his efforts as a speaker on the Treasury Bench during last session,
it must be obvious to you as it was to him, that he failed
altogether. The difference which you point out, as to the effect
this change would have on the Catholic question, may to a certain
degree be past, but still I think, _as a Speaker_, his influence
would have much more weight than even if he remained in Cabinet.
The question is also one which materially affects Lord Grenville's
support of the Government; and Canning, Lord Liverpool, and Wynn
are now evidently treating with a view of connecting your uncles
more closely with them; also you must consider that Plunket, who is
also the organ of your party, still commands this question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account