Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been publishedBarton, William
History
Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been published
The result of the Norriton Observations of the Transit of Venus—as well
as those also made under the auspices of the American Philosophical
Society, at Philadelphia and Cape Henlopen—will be found, in detail, in
the first volume of the Transactions of that Society.[120] And “the Work
itself,” to which Dr. Smith refers, in his Report of the Proceedings of
the Norriton Committee, bears ample testimony to the transcendent
Astronomical Abilities of Mr. Rittenhouse.—Four days after the Transit,
Dr. Smith transmitted to the Hon. Mr. Penn, in London, a short account
of the Norriton Observations, more particularly mentioning the times of
the Contacts, and a few other circumstances attending them. This was
speedily communicated by Mr. Penn to the Rev. Mr. Maskelyne,[121] the
Astronomer Royal; who, acknowledging the receipt of the communication,
by a note, dated at Greenwich the 2d of August, 1769, says—“I thank you
for the account of the Pennsylvania Observations (of the Transit,) which
seem _excellent_ and _complete_,[122] and do honour to the gentlemen who
_made_ them[123], and those who promoted the undertaking;— among whom, I
reckon yourself[124] in the first place.”[125]
-----
Footnote 120:
The first volume of the Society’s Transactions contains (p. 125,)
among other observations of the transit of Venus in 1769, those made
at Baskenridge in New-Jersey, by the late Earl of Sterling. William
Alexander, the gentleman referred to, and who held this title, was (it
is believed) a native of New-York. It is presumable that the title he
bore was one to which he had an equitable right: It was recognized in
America, the country of his birth, from the time of his first
assumption of it until his death, although his claim to that honour
was not juridically established in Great Britain, where, in official
acts of that government, he was styled “William Alexander, Esq.
_claiming_ to be Earl of Sterling.” He was descended from Sir William
Alexander, in the reign of James I., to whom that monarch made a grant
of the province of Nova Scotia, on the 20th of September, 1621. On the
12th of July, 1625, Sir William obtained from King Charles I. a grant
of the soil, lordship and domains, of that province, which, with the
exception of “Port-Royal,” (Annapolis, on the Bay of Fundy,) formerly
the capital of the province, he conveyed on the 30th of April, 1630,
to Sir Claude de St. Etienne, lord of la Tour and Uarre, and to his
son Sir Charles de St. Etienne, lord of St. Deniscourt, on condition
that they should continue subjects to the crown of Scotland. This Sir
William was appointed by Charles I. commander in chief of Nova-Scotia.
Soon after the institution of the order of Baronets of Nova-Scotia, he
had been advanced to that dignity by Charles I. viz. on the 21st of
May, 1625; when the king conferred on him the privilege of coining
copper-money. In 1626, he was created Viscount Sterling: and on the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account