Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been publishedBarton, William
History
Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been published
Much as Mr. Rittenhouse was averse to controversy of any kind, he could
not content himself without publicly pointing out one palpable fallacy,
among the many mistakes which the last mentioned writer had fallen into:
for he did not notice the preceding production of ‘M. W.’ not deeming
it, probably, worthy of his attention. Accordingly, having been shewn
‘J. W.’s’ essay, with some remarks on it by his ingenious friend Mr.
Ellicott (then quite a young man,) Mr. Rittenhouse drew up some
observations, very concisely, on the errors of this Anti-Newtonian
essayist. This piece will be found in the same periodical work, for June
1776. Being addressed to Mr. Aitken, the publisher of the Magazine, our
Philosopher concludes his strictures thus: “I wish the gentleman would
be more cautious, for the future; as well on your own account as for the
sake of your readers, some of whom may be misled by the weakest
reasoning, on a subject which they do not understand[182] and I will
venture to assure him, that the whole doctrine of Infinites, which he is
pleased to call a sophism, will not produce one contradiction in a
mathematical head. Those of another cast[183] need not meddle with it,
since there is a sufficient variety of literary subjects to engage every
man, according to the bent of his genius.”
-----
Footnote 182:
In the beginning of these observations of Mr. Rittenhouse, on “J.
W.’s” piece, he says—“I am one of those who are ready to subscribe to
the general maxim, That perfection is not to be found in any thing
human; and therefore do not suppose the Newtonian philosophy to be so
perfect as not to admit of amendment: But I must confess, that almost
all the attempts to controvert that philosophy, which I have met with,
amount to nothing more than so many proofs, that those who made them
did not understand it. Of this kind, are the objections started by
your correspondent, J. W.”
Footnote 183:
Alluding, probably, to Metaphysicians; for, neither Mr. M. W. nor Dr.
J. W. was distinguished as a Mathematician.
-----
A further proof of Mr. Rittenhouse’s unremitting attachment to the
interests of science, even “amidst the calamities of an unhappy war,”
will be found in the following circumstances; a written memorial of
which, is preserved in the family of his friend, the late Dr. W. Smith.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account