Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been publishedBarton, William
History
Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been published
Notwithstanding all these proceedings, this extraordinary controversy
was not terminated until long afterwards. In consequence of a resolution
of the general assembly of Pennsylvania, of the 28th of August, 1783,
the supreme executive council of that state passed, on the 11th day of
the succeeding month, a resolution on their part, stating,—that, as many
of the objections which had hitherto prevented the determination of the
boundary-line, in question, were then removed, it became necessary to
close that business with all possible accuracy and dispatch; and that,
to this end, four commissioners should be immediately appointed, with
directions to provide the necessary astronomical apparatus, and to
correspond with those appointed by the state of Virginia for the same
purpose: they therefore appointed the Rev. John Ewing, D. D., David
Rittenhouse, Esq. treasurer of the state and Thomas Hutchins, Esq. to
perform that duty.
The arduous service thus assigned to these gentlemen, all of them
possessing great abilities, was accordingly executed; and a law was
thereupon passed by the legislature of Pennsylvania, on the 1st of
April, 1784; which, after reciting that the boundary-line agreed on by
the former commissioners, on the 31st of August, 1779,—and which is
therein stated to have been unanimously confirmed by Pennsylvania on the
23d of September, 1780, with the condition attached thereto by
Virginia,[199]—was by this law finally confirmed.
-----
Footnote 199:
The conditions proposed by the state of Virginia (and which
Pennsylvania considered as having a tendency to countenance
unwarrantable claims that might be made under the state of Virginia,
in consequence of pretended purchases or settlements, pending the
controversy,) were these; viz:—That the line, commonly called Mason
and Dixon’s line, be extended due west, 5° of long. to be computed
from the river Delaware, for the southern boundary of Pennsylvania,
and that a meridian, drawn from the western extremity thereof, to the
northern limits of the said states, respectively, be the western
boundary of Pennsylvania, for ever: on condition, that the private
property and rights of all persons, acquired under, founded on, or
recognized by the laws of either country, previous to the 31st of
August, 1779, should be saved and confirmed to them, although they
should be found to fall within the other; and that in the decision of
disputes thereon &c. (see act of 1st April, 1784.)
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account