Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been publishedBarton, William
History
Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been published
In expressing his admiration of “that dispositions of lands and seas,
which affords a communication between distant regions, and a mutual
exchange of benefits,” Dr. Rittenhouse unquestionably had in view a
commercial, as well as social, intercourse between the inhabitants of
different climes: he was too enlightened a man, not to have been aware
of its “benefits.” “A civilized nation, without commerce,” (as the
writer of these memoirs had occasion to observe in a former
publication,[316a]) “is a solecism in politics. It is in the rudest
state of mankind, only, that a people can exist, without any
communication with other societies or commercial intercourse among
themselves, every one supporting himself by his own labour. Indeed, so
absolute a state of nature can only be conceived; but has scarcely
existed in reality. The wants, the fears, the weakness, nay the very
nature of man, constitute him a social animal: and, in the very origin
of society, their mutual necessities, with the various talents, means,
and opportunities of individuals for supporting them, must have
produced a reciprocity of services, and an occasional interchange with
one another of that property, which each had acquired by his own
exertions.”
Footnote 316a:
The true interest of the United States, and particularly of
Pennsylvania, considered: published in 1786.
Footnote 317:
See his Oration.
-----
No man had less of “the gloomy spirit of misanthropy,” than Dr.
Rittenhouse: his whole life evinced, “with what ardour,” to use his own
words, “he wished for the happiness of the whole race of mankind.” And,
that he detested penuriousness, the contemptuous manner in which he has
treated the character of the miser, in his Oration, is sufficient to
testify. A manly spirit of independence, on the one hand, and a
disposition, on the other, to partake rationally of what are called the
good things of the world, induced him to pursue, in his style of living,
a middle course, between extreme parsimony and a prodigality equally
censurable. He was therefore, an economist. “His economy,” as Dr. Rush
has justly remarked, even “extended to a wise and profitable use of his
time:” for he was, when most in health, an early riser; and devoted much
of his time to reading and other studies, when not otherwise engaged or
usefully employed. So inestimable did our Philosopher deem this gift of
heaven to man, that, says his Eulogist, he observed on a certain
occasion, “that he once thought health the greatest blessing in the
world, but he now thought there was one thing of much greater value, and
that was time.”[318]
-----
Footnote 318:
In the year 1756, he made an eight-day clock, for his brother-in-law,
Mr. Barton; over the dial-plate of which, was engraven this mementory
motto—_Tempus fugit_; and underneath, this blunt but too often
necessary precept—_Go about your business_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account