Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been publishedBarton, William
History
Memoirs of the life of David Rittenhouse, LLD. F.R.S., late president of the American Philosophical Society, &c. : $b interspersed with various notices of many distinguished men : with an appendix, containing sundry philosophical and other papers, most of which have not hitherto been published
The Writer of these Memoirs sincerely regrets, that he differs very
widely, indeed, on this head, from a gentleman who has, himself, been
distinguished in the literary world by his learning, as well as by his
genius and science. “In speaking of Mr. Rittenhouse,” says his eloquent
Eulogist, “it has been common to lament his want of what is called a
liberal education.”—“Were education what it should be, in our public
seminaries,” continues our ingenious Professor, “this would have been a
misfortune; but conducted as it is at present, agreeably to the systems
adopted in Europe in the fifteenth century, I am disposed to believe
that his extensive knowledge, and splendid character, are to be ascribed
chiefly to his having escaped the pernicious influence of monkish
learning upon his mind, in early life. Had the usual forms of a public
education in the United States been imposed upon him; instead of
revolving through life in a planetary orbit, he would probably” says his
Eulogist “have consumed the force of his genius by fluttering around the
blaze of an evening taper: Rittenhouse the Philosopher, and one of the
luminaries of the 18th century, might have spent his hours of study in
composing syllogisms, or in measuring the feet of Greek and Latin
poetry.” In another part of his Eulogium, (wherein he notices some fine
and benevolent reflections of Dr. Rittenhouse, arising from a
contemplation of particular works of nature,) Dr. Rush addresses an
invocation to that distinguished class of learned men, the clergy, in
terms corresponding with his sentiments just quoted:—“If such,” says he,
“be the pious fruits of an attentive examination of the works of the
Creator, cease, ye ministers of the gospel, to defeat the design of your
benevolent labours, by interposing the common studies of the schools,
between our globe and the minds of young people.”[336]
-----
Footnote 336:
Three years before Dr. Rush expressed these opinions, so generally
unfavourable to classical learning and an academic education, he seems
to have thought these necessary qualifications for a _physician_ at
least. In his Lecture on the Character of DR. SYDENHAM, delivered in
Dec. 1793, is this passage: “From the short records of his life, which
have been published by the different editors of his works, it appears
that his education in academical learning and medicine, was perfectly
regular. He became a scholar at Oxford, and a doctor of medicine at
the university of Cambridge. I mention these facts,” adds our learned
Professor, “in order to refute an opinion which has been introduced by
some lazy and illiterate practitioners of physic, that he was indebted
wholly to intuition for all his knowledge of medicine. Men may become
wise and distinguished by meditation or observation, in the science of
morals and religion; but education and study are absolutely necessary
to constitute a great physician.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account