Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Volume 5 (of 10)Lockhart, J. G. (John Gibson)
History
Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Volume 5 (of 10)
Lockhart, J. G. (John Gibson)
Authors, Scottish -- 19th century -- Biography; Scott, Walter, 1771-1832
The last paragraph of this letter refers to an uncle of Laidlaw's (the
father of Hogg's friend, John Grieve), who at this time thought of
occupying a cottage on Scott's estate. He was a preacher of the
Cameronian sect, and had long ministered to a very small remnant of
"the hill-folk" scattered among the wilds of Ettrick. He was a very
good man, and had a most venerable and apostolical benignity of
aspect; but his prejudices were as extravagant as those of Cameron,
his patriarch, himself could have been. The project of his removal to
Tweedside was never realized.
The following admirable letter was written at the request of Messrs.
Constable, who had, on Scott's recommendation, undertaken the
publication of Mr. Maturin's novel, Women, or _Pour et Contre_. The
reverend author's Bertram had, it may be remembered, undergone some
rather rough usage in Coleridge's Biographia Literaria; {p.225} and
he was now desirous to revenge himself by a preface of the polemical
sort:--
TO THE REV. C. R. MATURIN, DUBLIN.
26th February, 1818.
DEAR SIR,--I am going to claim the utmost and best privilege
of sincere friendship and good-will, that of offering a few
words of well-meant advice; and you may be sure that the
occasion seems important to induce me to venture so far upon
your tolerance. It respects the preface to your work, which
Constable and Co. have sent to me. It is as well written as
that sort of thing can be; but will you forgive me if I
say--it is too much in the tone of the offence which gave
rise to it, to be agreeable either to good taste or to
general feeling. Coleridge's work has been little read or
heard of, and has made no general impression
whatever--certainly no impression unfavorable to you or your
play. In the opinion, therefore, of many, you will be
resenting an injury of which they are unacquainted with the
existence. If I see a man beating another unmercifully, I am
apt to condemn him upon the first blush of the business, and
hardly excuse him though I may afterwards learn he had ample
provocation. Besides, your diatribe is not _hujus loci_. We
take up a novel for amusement, and this current of
controversy breaks out upon us like a stream of lava out of
the side of a beautiful green hill; men will say you should
have reserved your disputes for reviews or periodical
publications, and they will sympathize less with your anger,
because they will not think the time proper for expressing
it. We are bad judges, bad physicians, and bad divines in
our own case; but, above all, we are seldom able, when
injured or insulted, to judge of the degree of sympathy
which the world will bear in our resentment and our
retaliation. The instant, however, that such degree of
sympathy is exceeded, we hurt ourselves, and not our
adversary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account