Memoirs of the Princesse de Ligne, Vol. 2 (of 2)Massalska, Apolonia Helena
History
Memoirs of the Princesse de Ligne, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Massalska, Apolonia Helena
Ligne, Charles Joseph, prince de, 1735-1814; Massalska, Apolonia Helena, 1763-1815
The Flemish rebellion was drawing to a close. After shaking off the
Austrian yoke the first act of the Flemish people had been to divide
into two hostile factions, one of which was anxious to preserve
the ancient, aristocratic, and sacerdotal constitution, to retain
which had been the motive of the revolution, while the other faction
supported the new doctrines of the constituent assembly in Paris.
Leopold, who had learnt the art of negotiating in Tuscany, and was
an astute politician, cleverly took advantage of the division of
opinions, and on coming to the throne[98] promised to restore to
Flanders all her ancient privileges, but at the same time despatched an
army strong enough to subdue her if necessary. The country offered no
resistance.[99]
On the 2d of December 1790 Leopold granted a general amnesty, and
before many months had passed all trace of the disturbances in Flanders
had disappeared.
After enjoying for some time the happiness of seeing her son, the
Princesse de Ligne left for Brussels and Bel Œil, in order to repair
the damages these residences had sustained during the revolution, for
they had been abandoned ever since 1787. It was precisely at this
period that Hélène’s letters asking for a divorce reached her husband.
The de Ligne family had several times expressed their displeasure at
the prolonged stay of the Princesse Charles in Poland. At first she had
answered evasively, then, having inquired after her little daughter
Sidonie, she ceased writing altogether.
Hélène’s sudden departure and prolonged stay in Ukrania had created
a great sensation in Warsaw. The Princesse Maréchale and other great
ladies, who were spending the winter in Vienna, related the adventure,
and commented upon it. The Lignes, as may easily be supposed, were
greatly offended at Hélène’s imprudent escapade, and, far from
favourably receiving her request for a divorce, they absolutely refused
to consent to it. It may be supposed that if the lady whom he loved
had been free, Prince Charles would have sent a different answer, but
there existed, evidently, some insurmountable obstacle to their union.
Meanwhile the Count, who directed all Hélène’s affairs, started for
Paris, invested by her with full powers to treat with the Lignes; for
the Princesse Charles was still under the delusion that her request
would be granted. On his arrival in Paris he had a first interview
with the Prince de Ligne’s steward, and gave him a copy of his deed of
authorization.
The steward went off at once to confer with the Prince on these grave
questions, but when he returned to Paris he found that the Count, who
in the meantime had heard from Hélène of Prince Charles’s decided
refusal, had already taken his departure.
The following is the letter the steward had brought.
LETTER FROM THE PRINCE DE LIGNE.
VIENNA, _15th January 1791_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account