Memorabilia; Or Recollections, Historical, Biographical, and AntiquarianSavage, James
History
Memorabilia; Or Recollections, Historical, Biographical, and Antiquarian
Savage, James
History -- Miscellanea; Savage, James, 1767-1845
Footnote 62:
These rules are extracted from the Antiquarian Repertory, vol. ii. p.
124; and from the Introduction to Gough’s “History of Sepulchral
Monuments,” p. 115.
Footnote 63:
This account of these monuments is extracted from Gough’s “History of
Sepulchral Monuments.”
Footnote 64:
This monument was asserted by Green, in his History of Worcester, to
have been a cenotaph, and accordingly the Dean and Chapter had
determined on its removal, intending to place it over the supposed
remains of the king in the lady chapel. But on opening the tomb on
Monday, July the 17th, 1797, the royal remains were found therein in a
stone coffin, the internal measure of which from the feet to the top
of the excavation hollowed out for the head, was 5 feet 6 inches and a
half. The body was doubtless originally placed in the coffin, nearly
in the same form, and arrayed in such a robe as the figure on the
tomb, with his sword in his left hand, and booted, but it was so much
deranged as evidently to shew that it had been disturbed, and that
perhaps at its removal from the place of its first interment in the
lady chapel, if ever that event had taken place, which seems to have
been a controverted point with historians. The most perfect part of
the body seemed to be the toes, on some of which the nails were still
distinguishable, but of what the dress had originally been composed,
could be only matter of conjecture. The influx of people, eager to see
the royal remains after an interment of nearly 600 years, was so great
as to be the cause of the tomb being closed on the following day.
Footnote 65:
The monument of Walter de Langton, Dean of York, who died in 1279, was
the first in that Cathedral that had an inscription upon it. It was
destroyed by the Puritans during the Cromwell Usurpation.
Footnote 66:
Coffins formed of a single stone, hollowed with a chissel, are an
improvement which has been attributed to the Romans. Sometimes they
were of marble. Some contained two or more bodies, others only one, in
which case, it was not unusual for them to be made to fit the body,
with cavities for the reception of the head and arms, and other
protuberances.
The solid stone or marble coffin, often curiously wrought, was in use
among the first christians in England, who, in all probability, copied
the customs of the Romans, after those conquerors had quitted our
island.—Stone coffins were disused in the fifteenth century. None but
opulent persons were interred in coffins of this description; the body
was wrapped in fine linen, attired in the most honourable vestments,
and laid in spices. The coffin was placed no deeper in the ground,
than the thickness of a marble slab, or stone to be laid over it, even
with the surface of the pavement. The coffin shaped stones which are
frequently seen in churches at the present day, have, in general, been
the covers of stone coffins.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account