Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1De Quincey, Thomas
General
Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1
De Quincey, Thomas
English essays
For the same reason (and, without such aids, he would have had no
proper element in which to move his wings) he enriched his diction with
Hellenisms and with Hebraisms; [Footnote: The diction of Milton is a
case absolutely unique in literature: of many writers it has been said,
but of him only with truth, that he created a peculiar language. The
value must be tried by the result, not by inferences from _a priori_
principles; such inferences might lead us to anticipate an unfortunate
result; whereas, in fact, the diction of Milton is such that no other
could have supported his majestic style of thinking. The final result is
a _transcendant_ answer to all adverse criticism; but still it is to be
lamented that no man properly qualified has undertaken the examination
of the Miltonic diction as a separate problem. Listen to a popular
author of this day (Mr. Bulwer). He, speaking on this subject, asserts
(_England and the English_, p. 329), that, "_There is scarcely an
English idiom which Milton has not violated, or a foreign one which he
has not borrowed._" Now, in answer to this extravagant assertion, I will
venture to say that the two following are the sole cases of questionable
idiom throughout Milton:--1st, "Yet virgin of Proserpine from Jove;"
and, in this case, the same thing might be urged in apology which
Aristotle urges in another argument, namely, that _anonymon to pathos_,
the case is unprovided with _any_ suitable expression. How would it
be possible to convey in good English the circumstances here
indicated--namely, that Ceres was yet in those days of maiden innocence,
when she had borne no daughter to Jove? Second, I will cite a case
which, so far as I remember, has been noticed by no commentator; and,
probably, because they have failed to understand it. The case occurs
in the "Paradise Regained;" but where I do not at this moment remember.
"Will they _transact_ with God?" This is the passage; and a most
flagrant instance it offers of pure Latinism. _Transigere_, in the
language of the civil law, means to make a compromise; and the word
_transact_ is here used in that sense--a sense utterly unknown to the
English language. This is the worst case in Milton; and I do not know
that it has been ever noticed. Yet even here it may be doubted whether
Milton is not defensible; asking if they proposed to terminate their
difference with God after the fashion in use amongst courts of law, he
points properly enough to these worldly settlements by the technical
term which designated them. Thus, might a divine say: Will he arrest the
judgments of God by a _demurrer_? Thus, again, Hamlet apostrophizes the
lawyer's skull by the technical terms used in actions for assault,
&c. Besides, what proper term is there in English for expressing a
compromise? Edmund Burke, and other much older authors, express the idea
by the word _temperament_; but that word, though a good one, was at one
time considered an exotic term--equally a Gallicism and a Latinism.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account