Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1De Quincey, Thomas
General
Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1
De Quincey, Thomas
English essays
That argument is multiplied beyond all power of calculation; and
to have missed it is the most eminent instance of wilful blindness which
the records of human folly can furnish. But there is another refutation
lying in an opposite direction, which presses the fathers even more
urgently in the rear than this presses them in front; any author
posterior to Christianity, who should point to the decay of Oracles,
they would claim on their own side. But what would they have said
to Cicero,--by what resource of despair would they have parried his
authority, when insisting (as many times he does insist), forty and even
fifty years before the birth of Christ, on the languishing condition of
the Delphic Oracle? What evasion could they imagine here? How could that
languor be due to Christianity, which far anticipated the very birth of
Christianity? For, as to Cicero, who did not "far anticipate the
birth of Christianity." we allege _him_ rather because his work _De
Divinatione_ is so readily accessible, and because his testimony on
any subject is so full of weight, than because other and much older
authorities cannot be produced to the same effect. The Oracles of Greece
had lost their vigor and their palmy pride full two centuries before
the Christian era. Historical records show this _à posteriori_, whatever
were the cause; and the cause, which we will state hereafter, shows it
_à priori_, apart from the records.
Surely, therefore, Van Dale needed not to have pressed his victory over
the helpless fathers so unrelentingly, and after the first ten pages by
cases and proofs that are quite needless and _ex abundanti_; simply
the survival of any one distinguished Oracle upwards of four centuries
_after_ Christ--that is sufficient. But if with this fact we combine
the other fact, that all the principal Oracles had already begun to
languish, more than two centuries _before_ Christianity, there can be no
opening for a whisper of dissent upon any real question between Van Dale
and his opponents; namely, both as to the possibility of Christianity
coexisting with such forms of error, and the possibility that oracles
should be overthrown by merely Pagan, or internal changes. The less
plausible, however, that we find this error of the fathers, the more
curiosity we naturally feel about the source of that error; and the more
so, because Van Dale never turns his eyes in that direction.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account