Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1De Quincey, Thomas
General
Memorials and Other Papers — Volume 1
De Quincey, Thomas
English essays
excesses, even when they do not absolutely authorize them in their
personal examples. Now, when such representations are made, to what
standard of a just discipline is it that these writers would be
understood as appealing? Is it to some ideal, or to some existing
and known reality? Would they have England suppose that they are here
comparing the actual Oxford with some possible hypothetic or imaginable
Oxford,--with some ideal case, that is to say, about which great
discussions would arise as to its feasibility,--or that they are
comparing it with some known standard of discipline actually realized
and sustained for generations, in Leipsic, suppose, or Edinburgh, or
Leyden, or Salamanca? This is the question of questions, to which we
may demand an answer; and, according to that answer, observe the dilemma
into which these furciferous knaves must drop. If they are comparing
Oxford simply with some ideal and better Oxford, in some ideal and
better world, in that case all they have said--waiving its falsehoods of
fact--is no more than a flourish of rhetoric, and the whole
discussion may be referred to the shadowy combats of scholastic
declamation-mongers--those mock gladiators, and _umbratiles doctores_.
But if, on the other hand, they pretend to take their station upon the
known basis of some existing institution,--if they will pretend that, in
this impeachment of Oxford, they are proceeding upon a silent comparison
with Edinburgh, Glasgow, Jena, Leipsic, Padua, &c.,--then are they
self-exposed, as men not only without truth, but without shame. For now
comes in, as a sudden revelation, and as a sort of _deus ex machina_,
for the vindication of the truth, the simple answer to that question
proposed above, Wherefore, and to what end, are the vast edifices of
Oxford? A university, as universities are in general, needs not, I have
shown, to be a visible body--a building raised with hands. Wherefore,
then, is the _visible_ Oxford? To what _fifth_ end, refining upon the
ordinary ends of such institutions, is the far-stretching system of
Oxford _hospitia_, or monastic hotels, directed by their founders, or
applied by their present possessors? Hearken, reader, to the answer:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account