First and foremost, it is a matter of great regret that the _High
Cross_ has disappeared from its position in the city of Chester. It
has indeed left its name behind it, the junction of the four principal
streets in the centre of the city being still known as _The Cross_,
and being so named not from the fact of the cross-roads being there,
but from the structure which once stood on the spot. This was a tall
shaft with canopied head, on which were carved two rows of figures
in niches, and on the top an orb surmounted by a cross. The civic
buildings were close at hand, being built on to St. Peter’s Church, and
being styled _The Pentice_, probably from pent-house, as indicating
the way in which it was built on to the church. Though the offices of
the municipality have long since been moved to the Town Hall, the old
name is still preserved, one of the courts over which the Recorder
presides being called in documents “The Pentice Court.” The _High
Cross_ was taken down in 1646, when the Parliamentarians entered the
city, the other crosses having been destroyed in 1577 or earlier. It
was removed to Netherleigh House in the outskirts of the city, then the
home of the Cotgreaves. What is said to be the head of it is now in the
Grosvenor Museum at Chester, but the carvings have been cut away, as
it is quite plain; and the shaft is said to be in the grounds of Plas
Newydd at Llangollen. The suggestion has been made that the cross might
be restored, and though it could not be placed again on its old site,
owing to the confined space and the exigencies of traffic, it might
find a position of importance in some other part of the city. The _High
Cross_ was the scene of all great civic functions. Here, again and
again, royalty was received and conducted into the adjacent Pentice and
entertained. Here proclamations were read out with due formality, and
here the Mystery Plays were represented, the first performance having
taken place at the Abbey Gate before the Abbot and his brethren. The
cross would thus be associated in the minds of the citizens with much
of their civic life, and many noteworthy events in their history, and
for this reason, if for no other, its removal is much to be regretted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account