Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
Also I still maintain that Smith-Dorrien and Plumer should be the
2nd and 3rd Military Members, and perhaps one young distinguished
Indian Officer as 4th Military Lord. Haig, Inspector-General of
Cavalry in India, should be brought home as the principal Director
under _2nd Military Lord_. We must have youth and enthusiasm,
because it is only by the agency of young and enthusiastic
believers in the immense revolution which must be carried out, that
our scheme can bear fruit. The first thing of all is that every one
of the “old gang” must be cleared out! “lock, stock, and gunbarrel,
bob and sinker!” The next is that every one of the new men _must
be successful men_, and must be young and enthusiastic and cordial
supporters of the new policy--over every fellow’s door at the
War Office under the new régime has got to be written in large
letters:--
“No looking back. Remember Lot’s wife!”
* * * * *
1904.
(No date.)
The next pressing and important matter we have to deal with is _to
get the right men as Members of the new Army Council_. Either you
or Clarke have made a splendid observation that a rotten system
may be run effectively by good men but duffers would spoil the
work of the Angel Gabriel!... _If we don’t get in men who will
enthusiastically adopt our scheme and work with us_, LET US THROW
UP AT ONCE! as we shall only have an awful fiasco and I (for one)
don’t want to go down with my grey hairs to the grave sorrowing
and discredited! Therefore I suggest to you that we should agree
on our men and _run them at once!_ Like fighting the French Fleet!
it’s half the battle gained to take the offensive, propose our men,
give their advantages and ask them (our enemies) what they have to
say against them and suggest every beastly thing we can against any
likely competitors--Selection by Disparagement! I put forward names
in enclosed paper simply as a basis.
1st Military Member--_Sir John French_, because he never failed
in Africa (the grave of Military Reputations). He is _young_
and _energetic_, has commanded the 1st Army Corps so far with
conspicuous success and has the _splendid gift_ of choosing the
right men to work with him (_vide_ his Staff in S. Africa, the
best Staff out there) and as 1st Military Lord it would be his
special function to prepare the Army in the Field for fighting,
and who therefore better to command it when war breaks out, as his
functions then at the War Office would disappear and be transferred
to the Commander-in-Chief at the seat of war--Further, he is an
enthusiastic and out-and-out believer in joint Naval and Military
operations as the proper species of manœuvres for this Nation.
In this belief he is almost solitary amongst all the Generals,
who all want to play at the German Army. “_Plump for French and
Efficiency!” Any vote given against French is a vote given for
Kelly-Kenny instead!_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account