Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
... Really all my thoughts are with my Royal Commission. I expect
you will see that the course of action will inevitably result
in what I ventured to indicate _if only_ the Admiralty will keep
their backs to the wall of the irreducible margin required in
Home Waters. The only pity was that dear old ---- said we were
sufficiently strong for two years or more, which of course is quite
true, but his saying so may prevent Lloyd George being hustled (_as
he otherwise would have been_). Luckily I prevented ---- saying
even more of our present great preponderance--but let us hope
“All’s well that ends well.” Ian Hamilton came in most effectively
with his witnessing the armoured Cruiser “Suffolk” laden with
a Battalion of the Malta Garrison being twice torpedoed by a
submarine.
* * * * *
1912.
_July 15th._
... This instant the news has come to me that there are
750 eligible and selected candidates for 60 vacancies for
Boy-Artificers in the Navy at the approaching examination! When I
introduced this scheme 8 years ago every man’s hand was against me,
and the whole weight of Trades Unionism inside the House of Commons
and out of it was organised against me.... We were dominated by the
Engineers! We had to accept Engine Room artificers for the Navy
who had been brought up on making bicycles! _Now_, these boys are
suckled on the marine engine! and they have knocked out the old lot
completely. Our very best Engine Room artificers now in the Navy
are these boys! Not one of my colleagues or anyone else supported
me! _Do you wonder that I don’t care a d--n what anyone says?_
The man you are going to see on Wednesday--how has he recognised
that we are at this moment stronger than the Triple Alliance? The
leaders of both political parties--how have they recognised that
19 millions sterling of public money _actually allocated_ was
saved and the re-arrangement of British Sea Power so stealthily
carried out that not a sign appeared of any remark by either our
own or by any Foreign Diplomatists, until an obscure article in
the _Scientific American_ by Admiral Mahan stated that of a sudden
he (Mahan) had discovered that 88 per cent. of the Sea Power of
England was concentrated on Germany? But the most ludicrous thing
of all is that up to this very moment no one has really recognised
that the Dreadnought caused such a deepening and dredging of German
harbours and their approaches, and a new Kiel Canal, as to cripple
Germany up to A.D. 1915, and make their coasts accessible, which
were previously denied to our ships because of their heavy draught
for service in all the world!
* * * * *
1912.
_August 2nd._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account