Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord FisherFisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
History
Memories, by Admiral of the Fleet, Lord Fisher
Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron
Admirals -- Great Britain -- Biography; Fisher, John Arbuthnot Fisher, Baron, 1841-1920; Great Britain. Royal Navy
I began these talks by solemnly declaring that I would not mention
a single living name--please let it stand--it shows what one’s
intention was; but one is really forced to stand up to such outstanding
personalities as Sir Arthur Wilson and Sir Francis Bridgeman, and I
again repeat with all the emphasis at my command that it would have
been impossible to have conducted those eight great years of ceaseless
reform, culminating in the production of the most incomparable fleet
that ever existed, had not the two Political Administrations, four
First Lords, and every member of the several Boards of Admiralty been,
as I described them in public, united, determined, and progressive.
Never for one instant did a single Board of Admiralty during that time
lay on its oars. For to rest on our oars would not have been standing
still; the malignant tide was fierce against us, and the younger
Officers of the fleet responded splendidly.
On January 3rd, 1903, I wrote as follows in reply to some criticism of
me as First Sea Lord:--
“Our Fleets are 50 per cent. more at sea, and we hit the target 50 per
cent. more than we did two years ago.
“In the first year there were 2,000 more misses than hits!
“In the second year there were 2,000 more hits than misses!”
The very first thing I did when I returned to the Admiralty as First
Sea Lord for those seven months in the first year of the war was
instantly to get back Sir Percy Scott into the Fighting Arena. I had
but one answer to all his detractors and to the opposition to his
return:--
“_He hits the target!_”
He _also_ was maliciously maligned. I don’t mean to say that Sir Percy
Scott indulges in soft soap towards his superiors. I don’t think he
ever poured hot water down anybody’s back. Let us thank God he didn’t!
I have repeatedly said (and I reiterate it whenever I get the chance)
that Nelson was nothing if he was not insubordinate. Nelson’s four
immortal Big Fights are brilliant and everlasting testimonies to the
virtues of Self-Assertion, Self-Reliance, and Contempt of Authority.
But of Nelson and the Nelsonic attributes I treat in another place.
(Ah! Lord Rosebery, if only you had written “Nelson’s Last Phase”!
I entreated you, but without avail!) (Again a repetition!) Nelson’s
_Life_ not yet written! Southey’s _Life_, meant only for schoolboys,
still holds the field. W. T. Stead might have done it, for the sacred
fire of Great Emotions was the calorific of Stead’s Internal Combustion
Engine. Suffice it to say of Sir Percy Scott that it was he and he
alone who made the first start of the Fleet’s hitting the enemy and not
missing him. Why hasn’t _he_ been made a Viscount? But that is reserved
for those in another sphere!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account