DEAR PAPA,—Wednesday we had some young ladies to spend the day
and had a jolly time. At sunset we all went up on the rocks to
yell, for it was the 1st of August, “Yellers’ Day.” We made a
terrible noise and finally Mamma came to the door and said she
thought “St. Yeller was satisfied.” We had a very nice tea, and
in the evening, after looking at the moon, danced till we were
fairly worn out. The evening was wound up by Mr. Turner’s (the
brother of one of the young ladies, who came out about 6½)
knocking one-half of the gate off its hinges, which accident
gave us an opportunity of hopping onto the carriage steps and
renewing our vows of eternal friendship besides a great deal of
hugging and kissing.
Thomas Crawford, our uncle by marriage, came to the valley during one of
these summers. He was one of the foremost American sculptors of his day,
having designed some of the bronze doors at the Capitol, also the statue
of Liberty that crowns the dome of the building. This is familiar to all
Americans, since it has been reproduced on our five-dollar bills.
Uncle Crawford had worked beyond his strength and complained, that
summer, of trouble in one of his eyes. I remember an excursion to the
shores of the Bay, when Albert Sumner, the donor of our donkey, Uncle
Crawford and my father were of the party. The gentlemen amused
themselves with throwing sticks or stones into the water. This trivial
scene impressed itself upon my memory because of the tragic death, not
long afterward, of two of the actors in it. Albert Sumner, his wife and
daughter were at this time planning a trip to Europe. Mr. Summer was a
stout man, and some one jokingly remarked that fat people make good
swimmers. This speech was sadly recalled to our minds when the steamer
in which they sailed, the _Lyonnaise_, went to the bottom with all on
board.
No particulars of their fate were known. It was said that in cases of
shipwreck the law considered that the man would live longer than the
woman, being stronger physically. Hence he and his heirs would inherit
property. I notice that the law always has some very wise reason for
favoring the man rather than the woman. The heirs of Albert Sumner and
his daughter could thus have laid claim to such share of Mrs. Sumner’s
property as he would have inherited, as the supposititious survivor.
Charles Sumner and his family were not the sort of people to take
advantage of any such legal quibble. Mrs. Albert Sumner was a woman of
means and left heirs by a former husband, who very properly inherited
her fortune.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account