The early death of the Prince Consort had deprived her of her one
intimate adviser, her one trusty friend, and for forty years she remained
a lonely figure, widowed, and more than widowed, for her exalted station
deprived her of the companionship which humbler people can enjoy. She had
few friends, mostly ladies who had been with her in the happier days of
her life. Among these, perhaps the chief were the Duchess of Sutherland,
Lady Ely, Lady Churchill and Lady Augusta Stanley. These all died before
her—her last confidante was Lady Churchill, who predeceased her only by
a few days. Her trusty friends, Sir Charles Phipps, Sir Thomas Biddulph
and Sir Charles Grey, were long since dead. Sir Henry Ponsonby, her
devoted and brilliant private secretary, who for so many years had served
her most faithfully, died in 1895. Two excellent servants she had in Lord
Stamfordham and Sir Fleetwood Edwardes, but she would not have been human
had she not felt her solitude. Outliving is the curse of old age. Nor was
it only among her own personal attendants that the Queen paid the tribute
of sorrow which is the penalty of a long life. Two of her sons and one of
her daughters predeceased her. The gallant Emperor Frederick, her much
loved son-in-law, had died in 1888, her grandson, the Duke of Clarence,
in 1892. The Ashanti War led to the death of another son-in-law, Prince
Henry of Battenberg, in 1896. These are what may be called unnatural
sorrows, though, unfortunately, they are common enough. That we should
bury our fathers, though the grief be bitter and the loss irreparable, is
in the ordinary course of nature; to bury our sons seems a cruel reversal
of all fitness.
Through those long, solitary years the Queen performed the duties of
her Queenship with unflagging zeal and devotion, though she remained a
mystery, felt but invisible. The people, though they would fain have had
more opportunities of seeing her, respected her seclusion, knowing the
value of their Sovereign, and proud of the successes of her reign. She
came to the throne at a moment when the Crown was anything but popular.
George the Fourth had greatly estranged his subjects, and William the
Fourth was not the man to raise enthusiasm from the dead. That was
reserved for a young Princess who was literally called out of her sleep
to enter upon her high position when she was only eighteen years of age—a
mere child. She made the people feel the value of a monarchy, and so, in
the earthquake of 1848, when other thrones were tottering and falling,
hers was as firm as a rock. Such slight disturbances as there were hardly
excited alarm, and the Chartist rising, though important, was not an
actual danger to the throne.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account