There were some great actors in my young days. The infectious high
spirits of the younger Charles Mathews, the solemn fun of Buckstone,
Keeley, Toole and Paul Bedford at the Adelphi (the Paul-y-Tooly-technic,
as some wag called it), Wigan and Leigh Murray, Benjamin Webster and many
others were grand assets in the gaiety of the nation. It is something to
have seen Charles Mathews in _London Assurance_, Wigan with his perfect
French, in _The First Night_ (_Le Père de la Débutante_), Keeley and
Leigh Murray in _The Camp at Chobham_. What perfection of acting! In
light comedy and farce the English stage has always been richly endowed.
Of tragedy perhaps the less said the better.
In the early fifties Macready, Phelps and Charles Kean were supposed
to be the shining lights among the tragedians—Macready, indeed, soon
about to pass into a tradition.[34] To me they gave no pleasure.
They seemed to rant and roar and mouth, tearing to tatters Othello,
Shylock, Hamlet, Macbeth, King Lear. Their methods were purely academic,
mechanical and utterly unnatural. There was plenty of elocution, plenty
of declamation—nothing spontaneous, nothing humanly possible; everything
taught, nothing felt; of true emotion, begetting emotion in others, not a
trace.
I once, in 1856, saw _Othello_ played in a barn at Killarney; the Moor
was rather drunk, but he was as academic as the great professors; between
him and them there was small difference. It was a question of degree. But
here am I daring to criticize when I do not even know the jargon of the
trade. What is this that is come unto the son of Kish? Is Saul also among
the critics?
Be it my right to speak or not, I shall maintain that Robson, the
meteoric man who for so short a time was a blazing light in the
theatrical firmament, was the greatest actor that I ever saw on any stage
at home or abroad. Upon him the mantle of Garrick had fallen, for there
was no branch of his art that came amiss to him. He made his reputation
in grotesque farces such as _The Wandering Minstrel_ and _Boots at the
“Swan,”_ in which he showed the town masterpieces of eccentric character
study; in burlesque he had no rival; and now and then, as in _The Yellow
Dwarf_, he would burst into a fury of passionate acting without any
suspicion of rant, that sent cold thrills through the house, making men
feel what he would have been capable of achieving in tragedy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account