When on the twenty-first of the month (Old Style) the church was broken
into and robbed, and the two guardians murdered, their skulls being
battered in, as it was thought, with iron or leaden weights, great indeed
was the consternation amongst the faithful from the highest to the
lowest. The Tsar himself went to visit the scene of the tragedy. To the
_mujik_, intensely religious, not to say superstitious, the effect was
stupefying. An ordinary murder leaves him calm and cold, and the death
of the watchers was an affair of small account. What mattered a _mujik_
or two more or less? The violation of the holy shrine was quite another
matter.
After long and painstaking inquiries, circumstantial evidence showed that
one Gudzevitch, a soldier, was the murderer. As to that there could be
no doubt. But the man’s confession was necessary, and this could not be
obtained. Not all the cunning of judge and lawyers, not all the pious
exhortations of the arch-priest, Polissador, of the Church of St. Peter
and St. Paul, who visited him several times a day, were able to extract
a word from him. He remained as hard as a flint, stiffly protesting his
innocence in the face of every proof. Of repentance not a hint. As the
_Journal de St. Pétersbourg_ put it, “There was nothing for it but to
proceed to extreme measures.” There was at that time in prison another
soldier named Baouschkin, belonging to the Kharkov regiment. It was
determined to shut this man up in the same cell with Gudzevitch in the
hope that he might be able to worm something out of him.
On the seventh (nineteenth) of January, Baouschkin made his report. He
declared that Gudzevitch asked him for what crime he was in prison, and
that, on hearing that it was for murder, theft and arson Gudzevitch tried
to induce him to confess that he was the murderer of the two watchmen at
Peter the Great’s house; he argued that, as he must suffer, it would put
him in no worse position, and what a kindness he would be doing!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account