The Duke’s life was very full, for until the Prince of Wales reached
manhood it was upon him that many of the functions that the Royal Family
have to perform devolved; the Queen and Prince Albert only appearing on
rare and special occasions. Charity dinners, the laying of foundation
stones, hospital meetings and the hundred and one other duties which
he undertook in addition to the laborious work of Commander-in-Chief,
work which he never scamped and of which no detail escaped him, gave him
little leisure. Half a dozen days’ shooting, to which he often did me the
honour to invite me, a country visit or two, and a rare trip abroad, were
all the holidays that he allowed himself, and even when he travelled his
work followed him.
The abolition in 1895 of the office of Commander-in-Chief, an office
which he had held for thirty-nine years, was a cruel blow to the Duke. It
was no consolation to him that in announcing his so-called resignation
to the House of Commons on the 21st of June Mr. Campbell Bannerman
(afterwards Sir Henry) should have plastered him with eulogy and shed
crocodile tears over his loss, and it must have been bitter to the Queen,
when, in her own interest as well as in his, she felt bound to advise her
cousin to resign. I was in the House of Commons at the time and heard
the War Secretary’s speech. It was fulsome and disingenuous. It did not
ring true. When he spoke about his “emotion” the House felt that it was
fudge. If the changes which were proposed were necessary, and involved
the abolition of the Duke’s office, it would have been honest to say so,
instead of keeping up the farce that “The Duke makes way in order that
certain changes may be introduced.”
The Duke’s activities in other spheres, especially in all charitable
endeavours, did not cease with his retirement from the Army, in which,
from the outside, he continued to take the deepest interest. He was
strong enough in 1901 to ride at Queen Victoria’s funeral, though he
was then eighty-two years old; three years later, on the 17th of March,
he died. He was a warm-hearted man, and a most faithful friend, honest,
upright, and true in every relation of life.
The Duke of Cambridge’s affectionate nature was shown in the deep
attachment which existed between him and his mother. Never were mother
and son in more complete sympathy. The Duchess, indeed, was one of
those exceptional people who have the gift of winning hearts. During
the years when she and Princess Mary—before her marriage to the Duke of
Teck—were the only members of the Royal Family who were seen in general
society, their presence always gave pleasure. They were so gracious and
so unaffectedly gratified by any attempt to entertain them. Those who
saw Princess Mary sail up the aisle of St. George’s Chapel at a royal
wedding, looking as if the regal dignity of a hundred kings had been
concentrated in her, will never forget it. The Garter Standards seemed to
bow and do homage to her.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account