Menasseh ben Israel's Mission to Oliver Cromwell: Being a reprint of the pamphlets published by Menasseh ben Israel to promote the re-admission of the Jews to England, 1649-1656Manasseh ben Israel
History
Menasseh ben Israel's Mission to Oliver Cromwell: Being a reprint of the pamphlets published by Menasseh ben Israel to promote the re-admission of the Jews to England, 1649-1656
Manasseh ben Israel
Jews -- Great Britain
_Publick Intelligencer_, loc. cit.
Footnote 114:
Spence’s “Anecdotes,” p. 77.
Footnote 115:
“A Short Demurrer,” Part I. The publication of the pamphlet was
hurried to be in time for the Conference. It was written in seven
days, and the preface is dated December 14, four days before the last
meeting (_cf._ Preface to “Second Demurrer,” 1656).
Footnote 116:
_Jud. Memor._, p. 175; Burton, “Diary,” p. 309.
Footnote 117:
Burton, _loc. cit._
Footnote 118:
Burton, _loc. cit._
Footnote 119:
“Life of Henry Jessey,” pp. 67–68.
Footnote 120:
That Cromwell’s interposition took place under these circumstances is
an inference of the present writer’s. The statements in Jessey’s
“Life” clearly point to this conclusion.
Footnote 121:
These fragments of Cromwell’s speech are gathered from Jessey’s
“Narrative,” Crouch’s _Judæorum Memorabilia_, pp. 175–176, and
Spence’s “Anecdotes,” p. 77.
Footnote 122:
Testimony by Rycaut, who was present in the crowd (Spence’s
“Anecdotes,” p. 77).
Footnote 123:
Writing to Henry Cromwell about the Conference a week later, Thurloe
says, “I doe assure you that his highness is put to exercise every day
with the peevishness and wroth of some persons heere” (State Papers,
vol. iv. p. 343).
Footnote 124:
_Cf._ Conditions, ii., iii., iv., v., ix., xi., and xvii., in Barlow,
“The Care of the Jews,” pp. 67, 68, 70, 71, and 73.
Footnote 125:
_Infra_, p. lxxxiv-lxxxv.
Footnote 126:
In the Calendar of State Papers, Dom. (1655–1656), p. 15, it is
hypothetically dated November 13, the day on which Menasseh’s
proposals were referred to the Committee. This date is absolutely
impossible, as the Committee could not have ascertained the views it
reported to the Council in the course of a single afternoon. If it was
not drawn up on the 15th, it could not have been drawn up until the
Conference was over, as the Conference was specifically summoned to
advise the Committee.
Footnote 127:
I have to thank Dr. Gardiner for this ingenious conjecture. It
entirely accords with all the known facts.
Footnote 128:
Edit. Bohn, vol. i. p. 327.
Footnote 129:
_Supra_, p. xvii.
Footnote 130:
Guildhall Archives. Remembrancia, vol. ix. No. 44, pp. 1–18. I printed
the text of this petition in full in the _Jewish Chronicle_, November
15, 1899.
Footnote 131:
These grants are mentioned in a Jewish petition subsequently presented
to Cromwell (_infra_, pp. lxxxv-lxxxvi).
Footnote 132:
Gardiner, “Hist. of the Commonwealth,” vol. i. pp. 396–97.
Footnote 133:
Graetz, _Geschichte der Juden_, vol. x. p. 122.
Footnote 134:
Cal. State Papers, Dom., 1655–56, p. 82.
Footnote 135:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account