Sinclair, Mary Craig, 1883-1961; Sinclair, Upton, 1878-1968; Telepathy; Telepathy -- Case studies
Nevertheless, the possibility, especially on the part of a
hyperaesthetic percipient, of catching, to some extent, the sound of
unintended whispering by the agent stationed nearby, especially where
there is no guarantee that his lips are always closed, must be
admitted. This possibility has impressed some investigators, and
especially Herr Richard Baerwald, even beyond all logical grounds. The
named writer has said _also fort mit den Nahversuchen_ (so away with
near-experimentation)! I certainly agree that experiments for
telepathy should be made with sufficient space between agent and
percipient to make the suggestion that there may have been some
perception of involuntary whispering manifestly incredible and absurd.
Such was Mrs. Sinclair’s success under such conditions as to make it
probable that if there had been many scores of experiments under the
same conditions a like staggering ratio of success would have been
maintained. Nevertheless, I must maintain that the involuntary
whispering theory fails to touch many of the Sinclair experiments
attended with one or another degree of success, considering their
nature and the peculiar character of the percipient drawings.
In the first place, let me observe that where the experiments were to
transfer numbers the range of choice on the part of the percipient,
endeavoring to interpret any faintly heard indications by the posited
involuntary whispering, was strictly limited. If the agent were to
choose a figure from one to naught inclusive, the percipient’s range for
guessing would be but ten digits. If the agent was to choose some figure
from one to ninety-nine inclusive, the range for guessing would of
course be greater, yet more limited than at first appears to be the
case. There would be the ten digits, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen,
fifteen, twenty, thirty, forty, fifty, and in addition only combinations
from among the foregoing or made up of a digit with “teen” or “ty”
added. But where the agent drew whatever he pleased, generally an
object, his range was unlimited, and the task of the percipient
interpreting any indications by involuntary whispering would be much
more difficult. But still it would be theoretically possible. So we turn
to the next and overwhelming point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account