Sinclair, Mary Craig, 1883-1961; Sinclair, Upton, 1878-1968; Telepathy; Telepathy -- Case studies
Three years ago, being ill and not happy,[30] reached the crisis of
questioning. I wanted to know how to get well, and I wanted to know why
I wanted to get well. And so, I began to ask, where is the path toward
knowledge? In which little store-house will I find a clue to the answer?
I went to see the medical men who have access to one little store-house.
I went to the psychological healers who have access to another little
store-house. And I went to the only religious group in the world today
which seemed to have any real, or living religion.[31] From all three of
these sources, one clue, one hint, stood out as a real clue. From the
mass of purported knowledge it appeared to me to be the most
significant. It seemed to be the thing which produced results in all
these three domains, though the priests and priestesses of but one of
them seemed aware of the great significance of this hint.
It had to do with man’s mind, to begin with, but it seemed to lead into
the very heart of all the universe—into our “material bodies,” as well
as into our mental hopes and longings and joys and despairs. So I set to
work to experiment first with telepathy and clairvoyance. If
clairvoyance is real, I said, then we may have access to all knowledge.
We may really be fountains, or outlets of one vast mind. To have access
to _all knowledge_.
If telepathy is real, I said, then my mind is not my own. I’m just a
radio receiving set, which picks up the thoughts of all the other
creatures of this universe. I and the universe of men are _one_. I had
long known, of course, that my body was not my own—that it picked up
sun-rays, and cold-waves, and sound-vibrations, which shook the atoms of
my being into new forms; that I picked up iron and sulphur, and
phosphorus, and vitamines, and what not, when I ate the plants and
animals of my universe; in short, that I had to pick up the constituents
of a new body in the form of “fresh air” and “water” and “food” every
day of my life in order to maintain the hold I had on the thing I called
_my_ body. But somehow, in the vague way in which we think of the mind,
I had felt that mine was entirely my own. Surely it was not dependent
on, nor at the mercy of, outside forces—except in the one horrible,
inexorable way of its dependence on my own body. It was free, of course,
to accept ideas from other minds, if it wished; but it did not have to,
unless it wanted to. So I had believed. Now, with my new clue, I began
to wonder if all my life I had not been in error in my thinking, if I
had not got the scheme of things turned upside down. Had I been looking
at an image in a mirror, a reversal of the truth? Was my body dependent
on my mind when I had thought my mind was dependent on my body? Was it
sick when my mind was, and did it die when my mind died—of
discouragement? And was my mind my own, or did it receive and accept
thoughts constantly from all the other creatures of the universe without
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account