_Vaso-Motor._—Secretory phenomena; vascular phenomena; perspirations, etc. EXOSOMATIC AUTOMATISM (_Exteriorisations_): _Motor._—Telekinesis; psychography (direct writing); psychophony (direct voice). —— _Sensitive-Sensorial._—Telepathy; telæsthesia. —— _Plastic._—Materialisations; apports, etc. On the other hand, if we examine fraud in a general manner, we will notice the following correspondences: the words conscious and unconscious are taken in the sense of the personal consciousness:— _Motricity: normal._ 1. Conscious and Conscious voluntary voluntary fraud. Simulation; movements. responsibility. —— —— 2. Conscious but Conscious impulsive involuntary fraud. Simulation; movements. irresponsibility. —— —— 3. Unconscious and Impulsive and involuntary unconscious fraud; movements. irresponsibility. —— _paranormal._ 4. Exteriorisation of No fraud. motricity and plasticity; telekinesis; materialisations. _Sensibility: normal._ 5. Voluntary Voluntary and falsehood. conscious fraud. Simulation; responsibility. _Sensibility: normal._ 6. Illusions; No fraud; no real hallucinations; phenomenon. hypermnesiæ; paramnesiæ. —— _paranormal._ 7. Exteriorisation of No fraud; real the sensibility; phenomena. clairaudience; telepathy; clairvoyance. As for true exosomatic automatism, there can be no question of fraud as far as it is concerned. This classification, which I only give as an experiment, appears to me more complete than that of Ochorowicz’s (_Annales de Sciences Psychiques_, vi. 97). The latter distinguishes— (_a_) Conscious fraud. (_b_) Unconscious fraud: in the waking state } Medianity of an in the trance state } inferior order. (_c_) Partial, automatic fraud } Medianity of a (_d_) The pure phenomenon } superior order. If we compare Ochorowicz’s table with mine we will notice that his conscious fraud corresponds to Nos. 1 and 5 of my classification. His unconscious fraud to No. 3. I divide his partial, automatic fraud into the classes 2, 3, and 6. The pure phenomenon into the classes 4 and 7.